Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Karl Meier
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Karl Meier
- Code letter: N/A (B-ish but arbcom does not apply to commons), cross-wiki case, see notes
Notes:
- Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration /Coolcat, Davenbelle and Stereotek and /Moby Dick
- Karl Meier aka Stereotek aka possibly Igiveup
- Davenbelle aka Moby Dick
- Commons:Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Disputes#Complaint_about_abuse_of_adminship_by_Cool_Cat
- Obviously a person with en:wiki checkuser can't check commons so this needs to be a cooperative effort. I have pointed all four of the commons checkusers to here so as to keep the discussion in one place.
- I have consulted a Stewart about the matter but he said he is not allowed to act on the matter.
Currently the only thing that ties Karl Meier (formerly known as Stereotek) to this incident in commons is one edit. The purpose of this checkuser request is to rule out the possibility that User:Igiveup may be an impostor of Karl Meier.
--Cat out 16:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- I can confirm talking with Cool Cat about this, and that policy won't let me do the check. Jon Harald Søby 16:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Declined, the Karl Meier account on Wikipedia is too old to check anyway. Dmcdevit·t 21:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Additional information needed, I'm consulting with other CheckUsers to see if any previous results exist before I determine whether this will be useful. [ælfəks] 01:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Clerk note: whilst this is happening, I'll leave it in the "Outstanding requests" section. When you hear word either way (whether you can get some previous results), please post here so that this matter can be closed fully. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 10:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Declined for now. It seems obvious that commons:User:Igiveup is User:Karl Meier, and there do not appear to be grounds to check commons:User:Moby Dick at this time. [ælfəks] 04:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Clerk note: whilst this is happening, I'll leave it in the "Outstanding requests" section. When you hear word either way (whether you can get some previous results), please post here so that this matter can be closed fully. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 10:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.