Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/FruitsAndVegetables133

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/FruitsAndVegetables133}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

[edit] FruitsAndVegetables133

Checkuser required for Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/FruitsAndVegetables133. (Most text copied.)
Fruitsandvegatables133 was blocked originally for a week for sockpuppetry in a featured article discussion[1].
FreshFruitsRule was created on May 31, 2006, four days after FruitsAndVegetables133's block. Loghead1 has been floating around since May 14, 2006. Loghead1 left a few messages on FruitsAndVegetables133's talk as if to try to show different users; he also asked a question about sockpuppetry and when it could be used[1]. In terms of edits, it appeared the FruitsAndVegetables133's ultimate goal was to get Eburn, Ontario featured status, something that he was later blocked for. FreshFruitsRule and Loghead1 show similar behavior to FruitsAndVegetables133's edits in which all three have edited Embrun, Ontario. They all show similar behavior in how they act. Iolakana|(talk) 17:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Inconclusive Mackensen (talk) 22:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

[edit] FruitsAndVegetables133

FruitsAndVegetables133 is trying to get Embrun, Ontario promoted to feature article status, and appears to have created the last four accounts for vote-stacking (section 9), due to the fact that they have only 6 total edits between them combined. Editor88 03:48, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Declined. This is blatant, and those votes wouldn't count regardless. Mackensen (talk) 04:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_checkuser_Case_FruitsAndVegetables133_2449.html"