Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Executor-usa

[edit] Waffleknocka / Executor-usa

• Executor-usa (talk • contribs)
• Waffleknocka (talk • contribs)

I suspect that these are the same user, though I'm not sure which is the sock and which the puppet. Executor-USA was banned for legal threats and should have been banned for vandalising the article OITC fraud (currently deleted, though a ongoing deletion review is likely to result in the article being recreated at a less POV name). At the same time, Waffleknocka created a POV fork (now also deleted) of the deleted article, plus a related article which I'm nominating for deletion. Both users have the same writing style and an apparently identical agenda. I suspect that Waffleknocka is a sock of Executor-USA. I believe that we are likely to see more vandalism/threats from this source if and when the disputed article is recreated, and in advance of that I'd like to confirm whether we do in fact have a sockpuppet issue here. -- ChrisO 12:22, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

I've discovered that Waffleknocka is/has been using an open proxy server in Cambodia (which I've now blocked indefinitely). I'd be interested to know if Executor-USA is also using an open proxy. Could whoever runs CheckUser please also Google the IP address that it produces to see whether it's on any proxy lists? -- ChrisO 10:26, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Nope. Nothing showed up. He's been unbanned, incidentally. Mackensen (talk) 11:14, 9 May 2006 (UTC)