Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Chacor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Chacor}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Chacor

Chacor, who has violated WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL, WP:BLP, WP:SPAM, WP:NPA, and WP:RS, is attempting to frame me with an incredibly lame use of sockpuppeteering[1]. The fact that he listed it here leads me to strongly believe he is using a strawman sockpuppet. He has already engaged in actions that demand desysopping, but this really tops it all off. Ya ya ya ya ya ya 03:09, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Clearly a retaliatory RFCU. – Chacor 03:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
If you all have read WP:AN/I, Ya ya ya ya ya ya has had some sort of grievance against Chacor, so I would take such a request with a grain of salt. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 03:15, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Please ignore the above comments, the first of which only gives credence to my suspicions, and the second comes from ignorance. Chacor is violating virtually every Wikipedia policy regarding conduct and procedure. His actions demand a desysopping and possible blocking. Ya ya ya ya ya ya 03:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
I have blocked the user for 48 hours for disruption. Any admins are welcome to extend such a block as they see fit. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 03:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Worthwhile to note it has been upped to an indef. – Chacor 03:48, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
And back down to 48 hours. – Chacor 11:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Rejected Mackensen (talk) 15:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.