Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Calgacus

[edit] Calgacus

• Calgacus (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Gaelicmichael (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser)

I suspect that User:Gaelicmichael is a sockpuppet of User:Calgacus, who has backed up [[User:Calgacus|Calgacus] for example on Talk:Scottish_Gaelic_language, thereby assisting in an attempt to push a POV that suits user [[User:Calgacus|Calgacus]. The aggressive style is consistant between the two users, and Gaelicmichael seemed to appear when Calgacus wasn't getting broad backing. I am very sure one is the sockpuppet of the other. See here Talk:Scottish_Gaelic_language. ---Bluegold 17:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Investigators, please carry out Bluegold's request. As this user intends only to disrupt wiki, he will probably get permabanned eventually. This post, in which Bluegold is carrying out his threat to be "leaner and meaner" after coming back from his sockpuppetry ban (see Talk:Bluegold), will make it easier when he eventually comes before a WP:RfArb, saving other users the wasting of their wiki time which this user causes. Please also note that this user is attempting to remove his confirmed sockpuppet tag. - Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 17:21, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

• Highly impossible. Mackensen (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi. I know it takes up time, but this user is making public allegations against me. He made the allegation on Talk:Irish Wikipedians' Noticeboard, and unless the allegations are officially disproved, my reputation will have a shadow cast across it, and doubtless Bluegold will continue to spread the accusation. - Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 17:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Strange Mackensen how your name popped again! I know that they are sockpuppets. Highly impossible sounds Highly suspicious, and why did you deal with it so quickly? Bluegold 18:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

• Yes, strange that one of a half-dozen people with access rights ran the request. I ran it because you've been running around the 'pedia claiming he was socking. He's not. Now leave it be. Mackensen (talk) 18:05, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I'll leave it there, but you are not fooling me. Bluegold 18:08, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Because you don't need to use Checkuser or to do any sneaky stuff. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:08, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Maybe that's Calgacus, who knows? I remember from somewhere that Calgacus is in fact a Michael. I see Angus McLellan that you have edited out some of your last comments, so I will add to edit. I have the perfect right to report anyone whom I am suspicious of for engaging in sockpuppetry. Good job you don't run Wikipedia! Bluegold 18:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Actually I removed the comment as a possible invasion of privacy. This request is closed. Mackensen (talk) 18:51, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Calgacus

• Calgacus (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Whats all the fuss (talk • contribs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Explanation of the request for CheckUser. I am almost 1000% certain of sockpuppetry here in this case. Unfortunately I got lured into sockpuppetry because of this shining example by Calgacus. Calgacus is arrogant and hostile and intimidating to novice Wikipedians and accuses people of nationalism and POV on a very regular basis and I believe this exposure will chasten him, not for my sake, but for Wikipedia's sake.Bluegold 09:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Clerk note: The discussion has been removed and may be seen in the page history. Further discussion should take place on your respective talk pages or the appropriate noticeboard. Thatcher131 15:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Declined. First, we don't run checkusers to chasten people. Second, Mackensen made it very clear this subject was closed; if it shows up again, I'm blocking for disruption. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 06:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh, go ahead bar me! Quite frankly, I used to care, but not any longer. Bluegold 21:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)