Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Avraham

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Avraham}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Avraham

While the clerks here believe that my request was not eligiblie for a checkuser, the alleged main sock puppeteer user:SkipSmith, has accused user:TheActuary of being a sock puppet of myself; see here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:TheActuary&diff=prev&oldid=65521605 . I know who TheActuary is, so I know that is rediculous, but I would like it to be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Is that a proper use of checkuser? Further, would this turn of events allow for the reopening of my case? Thank you. -- Avi 12:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Declined The clerks are broadly right. There's been no evidence presented so there are no grounds to run a check. He's welcome to bring those allegations here, of course. Mackensen (talk) 21:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Very well, as you wish. -- Avi 21:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Now, we frown quite heavily on people spouting retaliatory allegations of sockpuppetry. If it becomes a nuisance, we'll consider a check on those grounds. Mackensen (talk) 21:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
(See related case Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Skipsmith.) Thatcher131 22:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Avi 21:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Regarding retaliatory allegations, please see here: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Avraham. I will tag all of the Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Skipsmith, with perhaps the exception of the last IP, with sockpuppet tags eventually, but if this changes your mind about the case, and especially if it means you would check Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Skipsmith, I would appreciate it. But I understand that proper protocol must be followed. Thank you. -- Avi 13:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

As a note, this has taken a turn for the worse, as I feel that I have been libeled, or almost libeled, by Skipsmith here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASuspected_sock_puppets%2FSkipSmith&diff=65792979&oldid=65760867 -- Avi 17:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_checkuser_Case_Avraham_77f0.html"