From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. It provides for suggestions by Arbitrators and other users and for comment by arbitrators, the parties and others. After the analysis of /Evidence here and development of proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies. Anyone who edits should sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they have confidence in on /Proposed decision.

Contents 1 Motions and requests by the parties 1.1 Template 1.2 Template 1.3 Template 2 Proposed temporary injunctions 2.1 Template 2.2 Template 2.3 Template 2.4 Template 3 Proposed final decision 3.1 Proposed principles 3.1.1 Assume good faith 3.1.2 NPOV 3.1.3 Bans due to disruption 3.1.4 Courtesy 3.1.5 Negotiation 3.1.6 Template 3.1.7 Template 3.2 Proposed findings of fact 3.2.1 Template 3.2.2 Locus of dispute 3.2.3 Personal attacks and discourtesy by Jacrosse 3.2.4 Justin Raimondo 3.2.5 Expression of minor viewpoint 3.2.6 Sustained edit warring by Jacrosse 3.2.7 Failure to negotiate in good faith 3.2.8 Template 3.3 Proposed remedies 3.3.1 Template 3.3.2 Jacrosse banned from politics 3.3.3 Jacrosse placed on probation 3.3.4 Jacrosse placed on general probation 3.3.5 Jacrosse placed on personal attack parole 3.3.6 Template 3.3.7 Template 3.3.8 Template 3.3.9 Template 3.4 Proposed enforcement 3.4.1 Template 3.4.2 Enforcement by block 3.4.3 Template 3.4.4 Template 3.4.5 Template 3.5 Analysis of evidence 3.5.1 Template 3.5.2 Template 3.5.3 Template 3.5.4 Template 3.5.5 Template 3.5.6 Template 3.5.7 Template 3.6 General discussion

[edit] Motions and requests by the parties

[edit] Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Proposed temporary injunctions

[edit] Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Proposed final decision

[edit] Proposed principles

[edit] Assume good faith

1) Assume good faith requires users to relate to other users upon the basis that they are here to work productively on the creation of an information resource, not simply to advance their point of view.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] NPOV

2) Wikipedia:Neutral point of view contemplates fair expression of all significant points of view regarding a matter. Minor points of view should be presented, but only in proportion to their significance.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Bans due to disruption

3) Users who disrupt an article or type of articles by tendentious editing may be banned from those articles, in extreme cases from Wikipedia.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Courtesy

4) Users are required to be reasonably courteous to other users, especially those they may disagree with.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Negotiation

5) Users need to be able to negotiate successfully with other users with differing perspectives if they wish to edit articles in controversial areas on which they hold strong opinion.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Proposed findings of fact

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Locus of dispute

1) The locus of this dispute is edits by Jacrosse (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) to Neoconservatism which relate to its alleged origins in the Trotskyist ideas of Max Shachtman, which edits are alleged to be original research. "Indeed, it has been suggested that much of the history of neoconservatism can be explained as a classic Leninist takeover of first the American left and then the American right by the followers of Max Shachtman Speech by Justin Raimondo"

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Personal attacks and discourtesy by Jacrosse

2) Jacrosse has been discourteous [1], [2], and [3] and has made personal attacks [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], and [13]

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Justin Raimondo

3) Jacrosse, if he is not Justin Raimondo himself, advances positions which are similar to those of Justin Raimondo, a minor public figure who takes a conservative anti-war stance. See hatchet job on Front Page Magazine, his anti-war website, and current leading article.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Expression of minor viewpoint

4) Although ascribed to Michael Lind, rather than Justin Raimondo, the view that Neoconservatism has roots in Trotskyism is included in Neoconservatism#Left-wing_roots_of_Neoconservative_organizations.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Sustained edit warring by Jacrosse

5) Jacrosse has engaged in sustained edit warring, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Jacrosse/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Thames

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Failure to negotiate in good faith

5) Based on political considerations, Jacrosse has expressed his unwillingness to negotiate with a Wikipedia user in good standing [14].

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Jacrosse banned from politics

1) Jacrosse is banned indefinitely from articles which concern politics. He may make suggestions or comments on talk pages.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Jacrosse placed on probation

2) Jacrosse is placed indefinitely on probation. He may be banned for good cause by any administrator from any article or talk page. All bans to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Jacrosse#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Jacrosse placed on general probation

3) Jacrosse is placed on general probation. Any three administrators for good cause may ban him from Wikipedia. All bans to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Jacrosse#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Jacrosse placed on personal attack parole

4) Jacrosse placed on personal attack parole. He may be briefly blocked if he makes personal attacks, up to a week in the event of repeat offenses. All blocks to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Jacrosse#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Proposed enforcement

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Enforcement by block

1) Any ban made shall be enforced by brief blocks, up to a week for repeat offenses. After five blocks, the maximum block shall increase to one year. Blocks to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Jacrosse#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Analysis of evidence

Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis

[edit] Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

[edit] General discussion

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others: