Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Everyking 2/Evidence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please make a header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.

When placing evidence here, please be considerate of the arbitrators and be concise. Long, rambling, or stream-of-conciousness rants are not helpful.

As such, it is extremely important that you use the prescribed format. Submitted evidence should include a link to the actual page diff; links to the page itself are not sufficient. For example, to cite the edit by Mennonot to the article Anomalous phenomenon adding a link to Hundredth Monkey use this form: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Anomalous_phenomenon&diff=0&oldid=5584644] [1].

This page is not for general discussion - for that, see talk page.

Please make a section for your evidence and add evidence only in your own section. Please limit your evidence to a maximum 1000 words and 100 diffs, a much shorter, concise presentation is more likely to be effective. Please focus on the issues raised in the complaint and answer and on diffs which illustrate behavior which relates to the issues.

If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please cite the evidence in your own section and provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Do not edit within the evidence section of any other user.

Be aware that the Arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent. If you are a participant in the case or a third party, please don't try to refactor the page, let the Arbitrators do it. If you object to evidence which is inserted by other participants or third parties please cite the evidence and voice your objections within your own section of the page. It is especially important to not remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, please leave it for the arbitrators to move.

Contents


[edit] Evidence presented by Carnildo

[edit] 24 January

[edit] 10 February

[edit] 16 February

[edit] 17 February

  • 12:30
    • Everyking reverted information related to Ashlee Simpson in October 24 [5]

[edit] 18 February

  • 7:14
    • Everyking reverted information related to Ashlee Simpson in October 24 [6]
  • 19:21
    • Everyking reverted information related to Ashlee Simpson in October 24 [7]
  • 23:00
    • Everyking reverted information related to Ashlee Simpson in October 24 [8]

[edit] 19 February

  • 19:37
    • Everyking reverted information related to Ashlee Simpson in October 24 [9]

[edit] 22 February

  • 23:07
    • Everyking reverted information related to Ashlee Simpson in October 24 [10]

[edit] 23 February

  • 1:19
    • Everyking reverted information related to Ashlee Simpson in October 24 [11]

[edit] 25 February

  • 16:57
    • RickK blocked him for 24 hours for the revert
  • 18:26
    • Neutrality unblocked, on the grounds that Everyking had promised not to revert Ashlee Simpson-related material.

[edit] 13 March

  • 5:47
    • Two weeks earlier, the "reviews" section of Autobiography (Ashlee Simpson album) was reduced from four paragraphs to a single paragraph. Everyking reverted that section of the article to its pre-reduction state [12]
  • About 19:00
    • Since the database was locked for maintenence, I report the revert in the IRC chatroom
  • 20:31
    • I revert his reversion [14]
  • 21:19
    • Everyking restores two of the three paragraphs [15] and I revert [16] and report on WP:AN/I [17] and in IRC
  • 21:50
    • Everyking restores one of the paragraphs [18]. ElBenevolente reverts [19] and I report on WP:AN/I [20] and in IRC
  • 22:03
    • Snowspinner blocks Everyking for 48 hours on the grounds that he made two reverts.
  • 22:13
    • After some baiting by Everyking in IRC, Snowspinner blocks Everyking for 100 days. Note that the older block wasn't removed, so this had no actual effect.
    • The comment that was the immediate cause of the block extension was a statement by Everyking to the effect of "I've reverted 100 articles recently, so I should be blocked for 100 days". Note that neither side was particularly civil towards the other during that exchange.
  • 22:22
    • Silsor unblocks Everyking, on the grounds that the 100-day block was excessive.

[edit] 14 March

  • 1:15
    • Everyking restores a different single paragraph. [21]
  • 1:43
    • I revert and implement some changes suggested by others on the talk page. [22]
  • 13:22
    • Tony Sidaway unblocks Everyking, on the grounds that Everyking had promised not to revert Ashlee Simpson-related material.

[edit] 18 March

  • 21:26, 17 March
    • Brian0918 adds a link to a video clip of Ashlee Simpson being booed [23]
  • 00:46
    • Everyking removes the link [24]
  • 10:37
    • Snowspinner blocks Everyking for 24 hours.
  • 16:16
    • Merovingian unblocks Everyking on the grounds that Everyking didn't mean to revert the article.

[edit] General evidence

Log of Everyking being blocked and unblocked: [25]


[edit] Evidence presented by Anthony

[edit] 24 January 2005

[edit] Evidence presented by Rhobite

[edit] 13 March

  • 22:13
    • I disagree with Carnildo's characterization of what went on in IRC. I recommend that the arbitrators obtain IRC logs and check for themselves. It is a misrepresentation to say that Everyking was the one doing the "baiting". The way I saw it, Snowspinner engaged and taunted Everyking as soon as Everyking joined the channel after being blocked.

[edit] Evidence presented by {your user name}

[edit] <day1> <month>

  • <timestamp1>
    • What happened.
  • <timestamp2>
    • What happened.
  • <timestamp3>
    • What happened.

[edit] <day2> <month>

  • <timestamp1>
    • What happened.
  • <timestamp2>
    • What happened.
  • <timestamp3>
    • What happened.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_arbitration_Everyking_2_Evidence_6841.html"