Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Riana dzasta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Riana dzasta
Voice your opinion (3/0/0) Ending 01:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Riana dzasta (talk • contribs) – I have heard a lot about this user & further investigation has provided me with enough reason to nominate Riana dzasta for adminship. I've never heard her be uncivil & she is always kind & welcoming. She takes part frequently in reverting vandalism & also regularly visits other admin hotspots, such as XfDs and RfAs. Riana's been here 7 months now, has amassed 8,000 edits & has over 3,500 mainspace edits. She's even got portal edits & usually ammasses 1,000+ edits per month! In anycase, she would no doubt benefit from the mop & so would Wikipedia. I can think of no other person at this exact second to nominate. Plus her userpage rocks. :) So yes, I have no doubt that she deserves adminship & I sincerly hope that you agree with me. Thanks, Spawn Man 01:21, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Co-nom by Fredil. I have to completely agree with Spawn Man here, Riana greatly deserves the mop and it's long past overdue if you ask me. She has my undying support :D Fredil 01:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: At this point in time, I decline. I don't believe I'm quite ready yet - I'd really prefer to have a few more months' experience. Perhaps I'm just underconfident, seeing as I've been offered nominations 3-4 months ago and refused for the same reasons, but the problems then still more or less stand. Profuse thanks to my nominators - your support means so much! I hope to see you here again in March/April of next year! :) riana_dzasta 02:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
- A:
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A:
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:
- General comments
- But I'm cutting it anyway :P I missed this! Well, there's always next time! — $PЯINGrαgђ Always loyal! 05:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Discussion
Support
- Nominator support – Of course! :) Spawn Man 01:27, 28 November 2006(UTC)
- Co-nominator support – See above :D Thanks for fixing my co-nom, : appears unconsciously when I'm trying to type normally (all the time, it took me an unbelievably long time to rewrite a section of Rakion). Fredil 01:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'll pretend you accepted and support... ;_; Oh well, maybe next year, ey? Daveydweeb (chat/review!) 03:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Another-great-editor-running-for-adminship? support even if you have declined - you deserve it :) Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 04:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral