Representation before the European Patent Office

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The European Patent Convention (EPC), the multilateral treaty providing the legal system according to which European patents are granted, contains provisions regarding whether a natural or legal person needs to be represented in proceedings before the European Patent Office (EPO).

Contents

[edit] General rule and exceptions

There is no general obligation to be represented by a professional representative to act in proceedings before the EPO. However, a person not having either their residence or place of business within the territory of one of the EPC Contracting States "must be represented by a professional representative and act through him in all proceedings", except for filing a European patent application (Article 133(2) EPC). Proceedings include grant proceedings (as applicant), in opposition proceedings (as patentee, opponent or intervener pursuant to Article 105 EPC) and in appeal proceedings (as appellant or respondent) (Article 133(1) EPC).

Representation of persons who must be represented and persons who do not need to be represented but who want to be represented must be by a professional representative, or in some circumstances by an authorised employee (Article 133(3) EPC) or by a legal practitioner (Article 134(7) EPC).

[edit] Professional representatives

Professional representatives bear the title of European patent attorney (EPA). In order to be a European patent attorney, one must (see Article 134(2) EPC):

  • be a national of one of the EPC Contracting States (although this requirement can be relaxed by the President of the EPO is "special circumstances" (Article 134(7) EPC);
  • have a place of business in one of the EPC Contracting States; and
  • have passed the European qualifying examination (EQE) or have been a qualified or experienced Patent Attorney as at the entry into force of the EPC in their state (the grandfather clause, Article 163 EPC).

The European qualifying examination (EQE) is a three-day pen-and-paper examination, comprising four papers:

  • Paper A (3½ hours) consists in drafting of claims and introduction of a European patent application, on the basis of the fictional letter by an inventor describing an invention and prior art documents.
  • Paper B (4 hours) consists in replying to a communication of an Examining Division raising substantive objections to a patent application, such novelty and inventive step objections.
  • Paper C (6 hours) consists in drafting a notice of opposition against a granted European patent.
  • Paper D actually consists in two legal papers:
    • Paper D I (3 hours), which consists in a series of legal questions; and
    • Paper D II (4 hours), which consists in a legal case usually requiring analyzing the legal situation of a client and proposing actions to be undertaken to cope with the situation.

The EQE is held each year simultaneously in various cities throughout Europe. In 2006 for instance, it was held in Berlin, Berne, Bristol, Dublin, Helsinki, Madrid, Munich, Paris, Rome, Stockholm, Taastrup, The Hague, and Vienna.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

[edit] Literature

[edit] EPC

[edit] PCT


European Patent Organisation

Founding text : European Patent Convention (EPC)

Procedural steps : Grant procedure | Opposition | Appeal

Other topics : epoline | European Patent Bulletin | Register of European Patents | Official Journal of the European Patent Office (EPO) | Representation before the EPO | Software patents under the EPC

EPC Contracting States : Austria | Belgium | Bulgaria | Cyprus | Czech Republic | Denmark | Estonia | Finland | France | Germany | Greece | Hungary | Iceland | Ireland | Italy | Latvia | Liechtenstein | Lithuania | Luxembourg | Monaco | Netherlands | Poland | Portugal | Romania | Slovakia | Slovenia | Spain | Sweden | Switzerland | Turkey | United Kingdom

Extension States: Albania | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Croatia | Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia | Serbia

edit box