User talk:Redsully
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Redsully, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --keepsleeping quit your job! slack off! 01:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia...
and thanks for your edits to Vanderbilt University. They are appreciated. I'm just curious as to your comments to Esrever. Where you getting that he deleted your addition regarding the dropping of Men's soccer? The history of the page inicates that he acutally augmented your edits with information (I am assuming that your IP address is 129.59.44.34). Just trying to clarify any confusion here.
I also see that you enjoy photography. The Vanderbilt article desperates needs images to accentuate all that damn text. If you have any pictures of the campus or plan on take any, I encourage you to upload them to Wikimedia Commons (provided you do want to share them with the world) and add them to the article.
--Ttownfeen 02:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, yes, you're more than welcome to post on my talk page. Here's some tips, though. To avoid clutter and confusion, it's best to place new comments at the bottom of discussion and user talks pages and also to section off said comments, which is done by wrapping a topic statement by a pair of two equal signs. You can see what I mean by clicking the "edit this page" tab above.
- --Ttownfeen 07:19, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] clearing up men's soccer edits
As Ttownfeen noted, I wasn't deleting your additions. I just edited them a bit for clarity and to add a bit of information, so certainly no offense was intended. I'm just glad that we've now got someone else helping us keep the page up-to-date as new things develop at the university we all (presumably) love. :)
Esrever 03:17, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandy-kirland
With your permission, I'm uploading a brighter version of Vandy-kirkland.jpg. I just used a random picture editing program (in this case MS Office Photo Viewer or something) and hit Auto Correct. I hope this wasn't too presumptive of me.
--Ttownfeen 22:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Confederate vs. Memorial
In the process of adding a bit of information about Perry Wallace to the Vandy page, I changed the caption on your picture of Confederate. Whatever one's feelings on the controversy surrounding the building, its official name is simply Memorial Hall. Esrever 05:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
- By the way, thanks for adding all of those pictures in the first place. They really add a lot to the article I think. Esrever 05:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Based/Base
Re Private university: I used "based" because it is very clear that "lineage" in particular was used in the past. Bluntly, from, say, 1870 to 1970, Ivy League schools deliberately selected in such a way as to give preference to the WASP power structure. And circa 1920 Harvard and others got terrified that what had happened to Columbia would happen to them. Columbia had been meritocratic, and the percentage of Jews attending had gotten so large that WASPs were sending their scions elsewhere. Columbia was perceived to have declined in prestige as a result, and objectively the percentage of Columbia alumni in the Social Register declined. So starting in the 1920s Harvard and others rejiggered their admissions criteria to prevent too many Jews (and other riffraff) from gaining admission.
I didn't say "base" for two reasons. First, I believe the degree of such bias has diminished greatly in recent years. Second, I believe that the schools would currently assert that today there is no such bias at all. The statement that such selection criteria were used in the past is neutral, and sources can be cited, but the implication that they are still being used today might be controversial.
That's the reason I picked the word. It wasn't a lapse, it was deliberate. Dpbsmith (talk) 13:26, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Recent images
Hey, just wanted to drop you a note to ask you not to replace images with completely different ones, such as Image:Utcampus_night.JPG. If you would like to upload a new image, you may do so. However, there are already two other images of the Main Building in the UT article, so I'm not sure that another would be constructive. Also, in Image:Leslie cochran sign.jpg, in the description you say it's Public Domain, but the licensing says it's copyrighted and fair use, and neither show where the image is from. This should be cleared up. Thanks! —bbatsell ¿? 04:52, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- I've restored the original version of Image:Utcampus_night.JPG — not sure about the image from AP. You should change the image description to reflect where it came from and the URL (and remove the bit about it being public domain, which it isn't). —bbatsell ¿? 05:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Usmexbordersign.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Usmexbordersign.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:30, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Pacebend.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pacebend.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:46, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Vandystephensoncenter.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vandystephensoncenter.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sue Anne 07:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
