Talk:Rediff.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Makes too many unsubstantiated claims. Unless citations can be had, it should be tonbed down. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shabda (talk • contribs) 9:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Too much of alleged content
I feel that the neutrality of Wikipedia is compromised in this article, and that the POV moderators should have a serious relook of this. The article looks more like an advertisement of Rediff, and most of the alleged claims are not cited. For instance, it is written that "Rediffmail is the largest provider of web based email service in India" with no citations or references to back the claim. Plus content like "Rediff is known for its clean content" etc is purely advertising in nature, hence inevitably causing POV disruption. rahul regula 10:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)