Wikipedia:Recent changes patrol
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- "WP:RCP" redirects here. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. NP Patrol is now at Wikipedia:New pages patrol.
|
Recent changes patrol or RC patrol refers to the process of checking the recent changes to the wiki for harmful edits.
The patrol is entirely voluntary and carries no obligation. At its heart, it's really just a way to see that every edit gets checked in a timely manner and is given a boost on its way to becoming a "featured article", and that the rest of Wikipedia is not harmed.
Regular RC patrollers may wish to put the RC patrol userbox on their user page by adding {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}}: | ||
|
[edit] What to do
RC Patrolling primarily consists of a four step process:
- Identifying "bad" or "needy" edits
- RC patrollers efficiently identify problematic edits. A bad edit is an edit that for one reason or another needs to be entirely removed. A needy edit requires maintenance in some manner.
- Removing or improving the edit
- Needy edits should be tagged according to their need (ie {{wikify}}), or boldly changed immediately. Bad edits should likewise be tagged or deleted. Because no wikipedians like their edits to be deleted, it is important to leave concise but clear justifications on the talk page or in the edit summary. When adding tags, please consider placing them on the article's talk page rather than in the article itself.
- Warn the editor
- In the cases of deliberate vandalism or an evident lack of knowledge on Wikipedia procedure, offending editors should be warned on their talk pages. While this is an optional step, it should be a regular part of a patroller's duties, as it minimizes conflict, educates new editors and alerts admins of repeat offenders. For efficiency and consistency, standard warning templates can be found here.
- Check the user's other contributions
- You'll often find more edits with similar problems. Fix those as well.
[edit] Being nice
Throughout the entire process of RC patrol, it is important to remember not to bite the newbies. Far from being a monolithic horde of vandals, trolls, and spammers, the available evidence seems to indicate that newcomers write most of Wikipedia's content.[1]
If you see a new user or IP address contributing, {{subst:welcome}} them if you're so inclined, and include a pointer or two of feedback about how they can make their contributions even better. Most will gladly welcome the support.
It is also important to assume good faith as much as possible, or, minimally to assume incompetence instead of malice. For example, remember not everyone is as computer literate as you; some people will accidentally blank or damage pages when attempting to cut and paste material from Wikipedia. Others may not understand that, yes, their changes really are visible to the entire world.
[edit] Patrolling edits to existing pages
In general, one thing to keep in mind is not to focus only on patrolling articles in the main namespace. Image pages, for example, are freqently victims of nonsensical edits and vandalism. Such uncaught edits may be harmful due to malicious modification or collateral removal of copyright tags.
[edit] Newbie tests
Look for newbie tests (odd edits which are not vandalism), but don't bite the newcomers. Revert their experiments and leave one of the following messages on their user talk page. Be sure to timestamp (~~~~) the warning.
- {{subst:test}} ~~~~
- Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.
- {{subst:test1a}} ~~~~ (a variant suitable for blanking)
- Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you.
- {{subst:test2}} ~~~~
- Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
- {{subst:test2a}} ~~~~ (a variant suitable for blanking)
- Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Further non-constructive edits can be viewed as vandalism, and dealt with as below.
[edit] Spam
- Look for spam. If it comes in the form of articles, nominate them for deletion with {{db-spam}}, place a Proposed Deletion tag on them with {{subst:prod|Your Reasons Here}}, or nominate them at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If a user is posting multiple links to a particular website in several articles, revert the edits. In either case, again use warning templates.
[edit] Copyright violations
- Look for copyright violations and revert them. As per the instructions at Wikipedia:Copyright problems, just revert pages to remove copyright violations. However, take care to indicate in the edit summary that this is what you are doing. If an entire article is a copyvio see the section on copyvios in the new pages section below.
[edit] Vandalism
Look out for vandalism, and revert it. It is often worthwhile to check the page history after reverting to make sure you have removed all the vandalism. Also, check the user contributions of the vandal - you will often find more malicious edits.
Additionally, leave warning messages on the vandal's talk pages using the following system.
[edit] Warning templates
Note that these templates need not be used sequentially. If the edit is clearly vandalism, consider using {{blatantvandal}} or starting with {{test2}}. For continuing severe vandalism, {{test3}} may be skipped and a {{test4}} given straight after a test2. If, however, you are not sure that the edit is vandalism, always start with {{test}} If a user made such an edit and reverted it himself, use a {{selftest}}. For extreme or extensive cases of vandalism committed by users who have received no prior warnings, {{test4im}} may be used. The ~~~~ in the templates below cause the time and your signature to be added to the warning.
- {{subst:selftest}} ~~~~ (use if an edit appears to be a reversion of a newbie test)
- Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting or removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, welcome, and I hope that you will like Wikipedia.
- {{subst:test}} ~~~~ (use if an edit appears to have possibly not been an intentional act of vandalism)
- Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
- {{subst:blatantvandal}} ~~~~ (use if an edit is clearly vandalism)
- Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you.
- {{subst:test2}} ~~~~
- Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
- {{subst:test2a}} ~~~~ (a variant suitable for vandalism that consists of blanking text)
- Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
- {{subst:test3}} ~~~~
- Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
- {{subst:test4}} ~~~~
- This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
- {{subst:test4im}} ~~~~ (used as a first warning for extreme cases of vandalism)
- This is your only warning. Your recent vandalism has shown you to be intent on doing harm to Wikipedia. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Alternatively, you can use:
- {{subst:selftest-n|}} ~~~~
- {{subst:test-n|}} ~~~~
- {{subst:blatantvandal-n|}} ~~~~
- {{subst:test2-n|}} ~~~~
- {{subst:test2a-n|}} ~~~~
- {{subst:test3-n|}} ~~~~
- {{subst:test4-n|}} ~~~~
- {{subst:test4im-n|}} ~~~~
to explicitly state which articles were vandalized (suffix -n stands for named) and to add your signature. For example:
- {{subst:test-n|France}}
- Thanks for experimenting with the page France on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.
The "subst" causes the template text to be pasted into the talk page as if you had typed it out, instead of leaving {{subst:test}} visible when editing the page. This makes the messages more personal to the user, and thus, more friendly. Also, if someone vandalizes the template, then the vandalism will not affect every page that uses the text from the template.
If the vandal strikes again, list them at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Ensure that the user has been warned thoroughly before posting a notice on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. If a user has not been sufficiently warned, an administrator may simply remove the notice without action.
The blocking admin leaves this on the vandal's talk page:
- {{subst:blocked}} ~~~~
-
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.
Remember to sign and timestamp your warnings by leaving four tildes (like this: ~~~~).
[edit] Trace IP
Also, consider tracing the IP. Find owners by using:
- ARIN (North America)
- RIPE (Europe, the Middle East and Central Asia)
- APNIC (Asia Pacific)
- LACNIC (Latin American and Caribbean)
- AfriNIC (Africa)
(if an address is not in one, it will probably be in another), then add {{vandalip|Name of owner}} to the talk pages of users who vandalise - the realisation that they can be traced is often sufficient to make them stop.
[edit] Tools
The following is a list of tools and resources available for those who want to approach cleaning up with a more systematic approach.
[edit] Monitoring
The old school way is to load recent changes and check the (diff) links. If they contain harmful edits, you revert to the previous version. However, the high volume of edits that occur each second makes this nearly impossible most of the time, and several tools have been created to simplify the process:
- Vandal Fighter is a Java program that displays the IRC feed and allows filters to focus on certain types of changes (e.g. anonymous IPs). It also maintains a personal list of trusted users, watched articles, etc.
- Lupin's Anti-Vandal Tool monitors the RSS feed and flags edits with common vandalism terms. It also has a live spellcheck feature.
- VandalProof is a Windows program that provides several tools to make finding and reverting vandalism easier.
- VandalSniper, a VandalProof-like application, is currently in beta. At the moment it has only been confirmed to run on Linux.
- WikiGuard is an OSX program that monitors the IRC feed and attempts to approximate each edit's risk.
- RC birds is a Java program that emits different bird sounds for the RC feed depending on the user.
- The IRC Bot, pgkbot, by Pgk, runs on the IRC channels below.
- IRC Bots reporting at the #vandalism-en-wp channel on the freenode network list suspected vandalism edits (for example: blankings, edits made by blacklisted users, etc.)
- Young Orphans is a tool made by Interiot to find newly uploaded orphaned images. This is useful for finding various copyright violations and people who are using Wikipedia merely as an image hosting service.
[edit] Rollback scripts
Admins get a rollback button when looking at diffs in order to revert articles to their previous versions. However, non-admins can emulate such a button using several tools.
- RC patrol script gives non-admins revert, filter, and popup tools while using the (default) monobook skin.
- Godmode-light is a Javascript program to give nonadmins a rollback button.
- Navigation popups are a set of utils that appear when hovering over wikilinks. Particularly, hovering over links of old versions provides a "revert" link.
[edit] Special pages
- See the list of Wikipedia's most vandalized pages. The related changes link will display recent changes to all pages listed on Wikipedia:Most vandalized pages, for those who wish to follow vandalism on Wikipedia but who are unable or do not desire to use IRC bot tools.
- User:Adam1213/warn is a page that simplifies the process of warning vandals by allowing warnings to be submitted to specific users directly from the page.
[edit] IRC channels
Note that these are not owned by, operated by, or affiliated with Wikipedia.
- #vandalism-en-wp Primary RC bot listing/CVU meeting place (NickServ registration required; voice invitations available on request at #cvu-request)
- #wikipedia-en-vandalism2 User vandalism and alternative RC bot listings (NickServ registration required)
- #cvu Discussion/experimental bots channel (if you would like to report vandalism on IRC without registering, please do so here)
- #cvu-proxies Open proxy reporting channel
- #cvu-test Channel for bot testing
- #cvu-checkuser Requests for checkuser (only works when an admin with checkuser is online)
[edit] Other
WikiDefcon |
WikiDefcon 3: Significantly elevated levels of vandalism from shared IPs and experimenting users. |
[ | ]
Calling all troops, we need some help...a lot out tonight. — SeadogTalk 03:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC) |
- Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit, a Wikiproject committed to cleaning up vandalism.
- WikiDefcon is a tool used as an indication of the current overall level of vandalism that is taking place on Wikipedia. On the page, click the edit button below the Defcon meter to change its level from 5 to 1; 5 indicates very low levels of vandalism, and 1 indicates extremely high.
- Counter-Vandalism Wiki (Not owned by, operated by, or affiliated with Wikipedia.)
- Wikilink scripts enable you to double click on [[wikilinks]] within IRC clients. Useful if doing patrol on the IRC channels.
- There are other scripts that may be handy while doing cleanup (not necessarily vandalism cleanup). Check them at WikiProject User scripts/Scripts (WP:JS)
[edit] See also
- Wikipedia:The Motivation of a Vandal
- Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism -- for quick action in clear cases
- Wikipedia:Abuse reports -- for reporting abusive IP addresses to ISPs
- Wikipedia:Requests for investigation -- for more complex abuse, or to request a watch on a user/page.
- Template:TestTemplates -- a grid of templates that may be used on user talk pages
- Wikipedia:Dealing with AOL vandals
- Wikipedia:Edit war
- Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism
- MUSTARD, a project to promote several music guidelines, with a cleanup template that categorizes articles by their deficiencies