Reasonable suspicion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Criminal procedure |
---|
Investigating and charging crimes |
Criminal investigation |
Arrest warrant · Search warrant |
Probable cause · Knock and announce |
Exigent circumstance |
Search and seizure · Arrest |
Right to silence · Miranda warning (U.S.) |
Grand jury |
Criminal prosecution |
Statute of limitations · Nolle prosequi |
Bill of attainder · Ex post facto law |
Criminal jurisdiction · Extradition |
Habeas corpus · Bail |
Inquisitorial system · Adversarial system |
Charges and pleas |
Arraignment · Indictment |
Plea · Peremptory plea |
Nolo contendere (U.S.) · Plea bargain |
Related areas of law |
Criminal defenses |
Criminal law · Evidence |
Civil procedure |
Portals: Law · Criminal justice |
Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard in United States law that a person; has been, is, or is about to be, engaged in criminal activity based on specific and articulable facts and inferences. It is the basis for an investigatory or Terry stop by the police and requires less evidence than probable cause, the legal requirement for arrests and warrants. Reasonable suspicion is evaluated using the "reasonable person" or "reasonable officer" standard, in which said person in the same circumstances could reasonably believe a person has been, is, or is about to be, engaged in criminal activity; such suspicion is not a mere hunch. Police may also, based solely on reasonable suspicion of a threat to safety, frisk a suspect for weapons, but not for contraband like drugs. A combination of particular facts, even if individually innocuous, can form the basis of reasonable suspicion.
Contents |
[edit] Precedent
In Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled that a person can be stopped and frisked by a police officer based on a reasonable suspicion. Such a detention does not violate the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizure. In Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada the court further established that a person may be required to identify himself to an officer during such a stop. An arrest is not permitted based on reasonable suspicion; probable cause is required for an arrest. Further, a person is not required to answer any other questions during a Terry stop, and the detention must be brief.
[edit] Other Uses
[edit] Schools
A search of a school kid needn't be premised on the higher probable cause standard; rather, reasonable suspicion is enough to search a student's belongings. Overly intrusive searches, like a body cavity search, will require probable cause. See New Jersey v. T.L.O.
[edit] Immigration
Though U.S. Customs can do suspicionless searches of people and effects crossing the border (including passing through airport customs), non-routine searches, like slashing the spare tire of a car, require reasonable suspicion. United States v. Flores-Montano. Anything even more intrusive, like compelled surgery of a suspected balloon swallower, requires probable cause. United States v. Montoya De Hernandez.
[edit] Examples
Courts have ruled that a stop for a reasonable suspicion may be appropriate in the following cases: when a person possesses many unusual items which would be useful in a crime and appears agitated, when a person matches a description of a suspect, or when a person runs away at the sight of police officers. However, a reasonable suspicion may not apply merely because a person refuses to answer questions, declines to allow a voluntary search, or is of a suspected race or ethnicity.
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
- A definition on Dictionary.com