Re-evaluation Counseling

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re-evaluation Counseling, or RC is the world's major organization for Co-counseling. RC today spans over 40 countries and offers many individuals a cheap or largely free form of counseling and personal healing / growth. Within RC, its work is seen as focusing on combating societal oppressions such as racism and sexism, and the effects of those oppressions on individuals and society. The organisation is also involved in a number of political causes such as anti-racism, anti-capitalism and similar movements.

Founded by Harvey Jackins and his followers in the 1950s and early 60s, it is headquartered in Seattle, Wash. USA. Jackins, who died in 1999, originally had connections (until about 1954) to Dianetics as well as to unions and some other leftist movements. He created RC from a combination of concepts from Dianetics, psycho-analysis and Marxist philosophy, forming a new therapeutic method based on co-operative and free sharing of time and attention between individuals to each others' problems which he dubbed "co-counselling" and a new overall movement, establishing formal teaching methods and workshops to train co-counsellors, which he termed "Re-evaluation Counselling", delivered through Seattle-based "Personal Counselors", a small company which trained people in his methods, originally founded for the development of Dianetics in 1952. The headquarters unit of RC in Seattle provides counseling in a more traditional counselor/client model for fees, primarily to RC leaders or supporters.

1 Origins and basic beliefs
2 Organization
3 Development and liberation theory
4 RC Policy on sexuality
5 Cult allegations
6 See also
7 External links

[edit] Origins and basic beliefs

Jackins' own version of the origins of RC (disputed by many ex-RC members and specialists outside RC, who claim that Jackins combined elements of Dianetics, Marxist theory, psychoanalysis and other background theories that influenced L Ron Hubbard such as General Semantics) is essentially that he first began exploring the ideas that led to Re-evaluation counseling after observing a profound change in his very troubled friend after listening to the friend talk and cry at length about his troubles. Curious, Jackins slowly developed his own method which consisted of sharing attention between people in order to promote healing from painful distress through natural biological human reflexes such as crying, laughing, shaking and others, which he termed "discharge". This he believed, and RC members still believe, led in turn to "re-evaluations" or new ways of thinking, following the relief or having discharged and removed from current awareness the legacy of past hurts. Jackins termed the basic process of sharing attention "co-counseling" and the overall discipline "Re-evaluation Co-Counseling".

The RC organization and literature do not accept the description of its practice as psychotherapy, maintaining instead that the process of developing distress patterns that dissolve through emotional discharge in the context of appreciative attention is simply a natural process that does not imply either psychopathology on the part of the individual or the need for professional treatment. Re-evaluation Counseling regards other forms of "mainstream counseling" and psychotherapy in general as failed attempts to bring about relief from distress using methods that do not focus on discharge and re-emergence.

Practitioners of RC view the methods of RC as more effective than those of therapy groups at healing emotional hurts and increasing effectiveness, enjoyment of living, etc. However it should be noted that as a matter of policy RC does not ally itself with any other self-help, counselling, or pyschotherapy practice, but rather rejects all of these outright, even though there are obvious similarities in theory and practice to many. As a result, there are no independent or empirical studies done on the effectiveness of the RC "process", which the organisation accepts. It is therefore difficult for those outside RC to assess these claims in any objective way. Academics studying the value of different types of therapy have not had access to RC to attempt this, (but this is equally true of a number of other well known similar movements). RC'ers claim that RC has attempted to systematize and analyze the counseling process more comprehensively and (to some) believably than other counseling disciplines; but its detractors maintain that the theory is a hodge-podge of borrowed ideologies, linked by a collection of irrational premises (ie "all people are born good"). This has variously resulted in RC being praised for logical consistency and moral credibility or challenged as an insular pseudo-religious "walled garden" that is potentially harmful to participants. There has equally been no well researched evidence of such harm presented; even though several newspaper pieces, academic papers and studies written by psychotherapists from other disciplines have made such allegations.

[edit] Organization

Eventually Jackins' organization became officially known as the "The International Re-evaluation Counseling Community", or slight variations of that name. The current leader or "International Reference Person" is Tim Jackins, a former Math teacher from Palo Alto, California, and the founder's eldest son, who assumed the title when Harvey Jackins died in 1999. The core organization structure of RC consists of classes and local communities set up by experienced co-counselors, which are in turn organized by regions and, sometimes, loose country-wide affiliations. RC is against nationalism and hopes that by avoiding organizing on traditional national lines, this enables co-counselors to avoid national "restimulations" (RC terminology for behavior caused by a legacy of emotional hurts that have not been "discharged", influencing the response to current events without being aware that the behavior is linked to those past events) There are currently 270 organized areas internationally listed in the quarterly journal of Re-evaluation Counseling, 'Present Time'. RC does not have a central membership roll and no overall membership figures are available; the RC organisation claims that somewhere between 50 and 100 thousand people have learned RC since its beginnings and that there are probably around 10 to 15 thousand currently active RC practitioners, spread over about 40 countries. These figures are based on average calculations of class numbers from RC insider's calculations; Harvey Jackins in his own works claimed much larger numbers, but these claims are considered dubious. More analysis of this on the Harvey Jackins page.

[edit] Development and liberation theory

During the 1970's, the RC approach shifted emphasis to deal more with "oppression" issues for a wide variety of "liberation" groups (e.g., women, working class). As a result, many of its publications, workshops and leadership structure(s) are organized by these liberation groups. The RC organization and affiliates formulated an active response to the 9/11 tragedy and played an active role at the 2001 Durban World Conference against Racism. More recently they were involved in events of the 2006 World Social Forum, the main event of which was held in Caracas, and the World Peace Forum 2006, held in Vancouver. 2. When attending external events, RC often presents itself as "United to End Racism" (UER), a method that has been (unfavorably) compared by some to the methods of Scientology, presenting itself through "front" organizations that appear unconnected with the parent body. The RC website does not hide the RC connection with UER, and UER groups sometimes present their ideas as based on Re-evaluation counseling.3.

[edit] RC Policy on sexuality

The RC policy on sexuality was developed through the 1970's. Like most of the policies adopted by RC they are based on views on human nature by its founder Harvey Jackins and his followers which they state are garnered from insights from clients in the many co-counselling sessions they undertake. In keeping with the movement's emphasis on rational choice, Jackins constructed a policy on sexuality that deemed all strong sexual feelings for another (regardless of sex) to be suitable subjects for discharge, and unless consciously invoked, to be "restimulation". This largely theoretical viewpoint in practise means that RC suggests such feelings were not to be acted on immediately, but instead are to be counseled on and discharged repeatedly and that, we should only act on sexual feelings that we have previously chosen to have in a calm and delierate manner:

 Unless you calmly and deliberately decide to feel sexual because it  
 is the optimum rational behaviour in a particular situation, and  
 you decide to do it before you feel sexual, any sexual feelings 
 mean you are the victim of restimulation.

 [H,Jackins 1977, A Rational Theory of Sexuality p.12]

Jackins speculated that the majority of the population had been the victims of sexual abuse during early childhood and that this played a part in strong sexual restimulation. He also believed that young women were more likely than men to have been the victims of sexual abuse, as they are more sexually victimised and oppressed in most societies and cultures. More controversially he held that those that do not have any memory of such sexual abuse taking place may have partially or wholly repressed such memories, due to them being too painful to recall.

 [T]hat almost every woman, that almost every woman in our society, 
 has been sexually abused as a small child, and that a very large 
 proportion of all men have been abused sexually as small children.
 
 [H,Jackins 1977, A Rational Theory of Sexuality p.14,]

A specific policy on homosexuality, that views participation in same sex acts as being due to distress was also introduced by Harvey Jackins. The first half of this policy states that Reevaluation Counseling endorses “principled and deep opposition to any oppression of people who practice sex with people of their own gender or of people who identify themselves as Gay men, as Lesbians, or as ‘bisexuals’.” However, the second half of this official policy, sometimes called a ‘draft’ policy, but still in place and unrevised since 1995, goes on “participation in sex with a human of your own gender is based on distress. It arises only our of distress experiences in the past. The distress out of which it arises can become unoccluded, (if it has been occluded) and can be completely discharged.” reference on official RC site

In the article, Jackins says:

Officially and in the writings of Re-evaluation Counseling, it has always been stated that:

Re-evaluation Counseling opposes the oppression of Gay people as completely wrong. We in Re-evaluation Counseling have a responsibility to find ways to help the individuals saddled with the patterns that lead to this activity to discharge and remove such patterns, We in Re-evaluation Counseling cannot compromise with any "identification" of the person with a pattern which pushes the individual towards participation in sex with people of his or her own gender. We do not concur with any identification of oneself as Gay, Lesbian, or bisexual as ultimately "rational." (Participation in same-gender sex, and identifying oneself as Gay, are two separate activities that sometimes occur together, but not necessarily.)

It is also clear that identifying as Gay, Lesbian, or bisexual can temporarily be a helpful contradiction to the isolation and oppression. Few wide-world constituencies have developed the degree of support and contradiction to most distresses that some parts of the Gay/Lesbian/Bisexual community have done in recent years. In many places and activities in these communities both the goodness of the Gay/Lesbian/Bisexual person and copious discharge are validated and encouraged.

Is same-gender sex carried out between "consenting" adults that "bad"? It is harmful in its effects upon the people involved, as is any rehearsal of a distress pattern, but it is not, in general, more "bad" or "worse than" the ridiculous patterns which have become attached to much heterosexual sex (the many varieties of which range from fetishes to violence and back). It is not "necessarily" more irrational nor perhaps even as irrational as the condemnation patterns rehearsed by the people who perpetuate the oppression of Gay people by condemning them and attacking them. It is not "more irrational" than the great variety of patterns attached to heterosexual sex which are tolerated and practiced in these oppressive societies and cultures under such slogans as "the privacy of the marriage relationship" or "what happens between two consenting adults.". That much is clear.

The organization asserts that people are only gay because of some past hurt, and if they don’t remember any such trauma they can be encouraged to ‘remember’, in RC sessions. No critical discussion of any of the ‘draft’ policies occurs in any of the organizations publications, although it does in RC leadership-approved private mailing lists of lesbian, gay and bisexual members. LGB members of the organization are not allowed to use their real names in the organizations publications or on their website, although this is considered protective of them by RC in the context of a society where gay people still fall victim to oppressive action when identified. "In all publications or writing forms sponsored or produced by Re-evaluation Counseling, any writers identifying themselves as Lesbian or Gay must do so with pseudonyms rather than their given names."

[edit] Cult allegations

Re-evaluation counseling has sometimes been viewed as a cult, or as having cult-like aspects, in part because of Jackins' origins in Dianetics (he was originally the North-West U.S. organiser and a member of L Ron Hubbard's national governing body for Dianetics), which he abandoned in the mid-50s and adapted - therefore his organisation is also sometimes alternatively seen as a "Free Zone" or "Squirrel" (see Scientology beliefs and practices) offshoot of Scientology/Dianetics. RC "members" (the organisation does not have a uniform formal membership structure - membership varies from country to country and is essentially local in nature) have in the past been unaware of the Dianetics origins of RC, but information sharing on the internet has to some extent changed this. The current leadership of RC remain silent on the issue, republishing Jackins' official version of the origins of RC which contains no mention of Dianetics; as most current RC leaders were not in RC until many years after those events, they may simply not know about them, or if they have heard of them, prefer Jackins' own version.

Another aspect of the "cult" label being applied to RC is the combination of leadership charisma, non-criticism of leaders and centralized decision making that Jackins believed was needed to ensure success in "anti-pattern" progress of the RC method. To some, these appear similar to other alleged cults. Within RC these features are perceived as being required "to assist the average counselor in facing the difficulties of maintaining aware focus on the discharge process". The centralised authority of the leadership does not appear anecdotally to extend beyond decisions about who is allowed to attend events and to teach the subjects of RC, lead groups, and other internal matters; there does not appear to be a sustained effort anywhere in the organization to control the outside lives of "members". Therefore a key aspect of cult identification, undue control over members, is undermined in its application to RC. RC does not apply heavy financial charges for basic courses (RC "Fundamentals" classes) or further workshops and in general appears to avoid some of the other behaviors commonly attributed to cults, such as punishments, forced love, etc, although quick google searches do reveal a number of sexual abuse and other allegations leveled against Harvey Jackins dating from the early 80s. These are explored more thoroughly on the Harvey Jackins page.

Another factor that undermines the "cult" label is that leaders and members of Re-evaluation counseling frequently play other important roles in their community as government leaders, educators, non-profit organizers, artists etc. RC encourages members to use it as a tool to help move forward their personal goals and improve their communities, rather than to become insular adherents to some ideology. However, Jackins himself frequently urged members to infiltrate and advocate for RC-style philosophy within mainstream groups, which he termed "wide world change" so this may just be a consequence of this policy. The organization also advocates the formation of groups that promote the principles and style of organization of Reevaluation Counselling groups without disclosing to members their connection with the organization. These groups are called 'naturalized' groups. An example is United to End Racism (UER).