User talk:Razor romance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Are you asking

Are you asking how to create a sub-page and link it, how to link the normal pages, or how to link external pages? --16:01, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I think you might be talking about creating articles for each of the singles by H.I.M.. See: Help:Starting_a_new_page for a guide on how to do this. As for just linking wikipedia pages it works like this [[target page name]] and external pages link like this [http://www.websiteurl.com caption]. Hope this helps. --Wildnox 20:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

<<unblock|his reason is invilad in that he says pest. i have not contacted him because i do not have access to email my proxy settings will not allow it and i cannot post on his page to ask him why he blocked me. i think that this was a prank and i request that this be fixed. thank you for your help.>>

I've contacted the blocking administrator for comment; in the meantime, please bear with us, and thank you for your patience. Luna Santin 19:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

It appears that the block was made after Razor Romance recreated a page after the admin deleted it. [1] The admin then blocked Razor Romance without warning or so much as a talk message. --Wildnox 20:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons: OK, it turns out that Mikko Henrik Julius Paananen is a real person and is a member of HIM (band), but when you create a two line article containing "Mikkio Henrik Julius Paananen was born in Sweeden. he started playing drums in 1980." twice, how can you not expect to be mistakenly blocked for joking around? Please pay close attention to how other biographies are written on Wikipedia and take particular note of Wikipedia:Notability (people) and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons as well as marking the article as a stub while you start working on it. Thanks Request handled by:  Netsnipe  ►  20:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocking

Sorry about the block I imposed on you. I was clearly too hasty in this case both to decide that the repeat creation was malicious, or, for that matter, that the content was anything more than a feeble effort. I do sometimes block without warning when clearly offensive material involving obscenity, racism or personal attacks are recreated, since that amounts to vandalism, but that doesn't apply in this case, and I was clearly wrong to take the action I did without a warning first. My apologies, jimfbleak 05:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

I've actually blocked this guy - there's a prior warning on his talk page and I checked his contributions, which are childish nonsense. Could you have a look at Waylon Mclennan please - he's been at this, but I don't know what's wrong, if anything. jimfbleak 17:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

It's nonsense, and now gone. jimfbleak 17:31, 1 November 2006 (UTC)