User talk:Randel72
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Mugumbo
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. You may place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page if you oppose an article's speedy deletion. Thanks. Mkdw 02:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
It's apparent through your past actions that both 68.102.211.12 and 68.102.222.14 belong to you. The IP information tracks back to the same area in the United States and same ISP. I suggest you stop removing db speedy deletion tags as this user account will be blocked from this site along with its corresponding IP Block. 68.102.... If you wish to dispute the db tag please use hangon and follow the proper proceedures. Mkdw 03:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
If you continue to revert speedy delete tags either on this account or using IP addresses you will be blocked. --ArmadilloFromHell 03:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Falsely Acused?
Well firstly you can and are officially charged for two acts of vandalism. Your article Mugumbo, which has been locked and deleted, failed several Wikipedia policies; slang, WP:NEO, Notability Guidelines, etc. The second charge was you removed a db speedy deletion tag I had placed on that article. The history for the deletion article shows that Randel72 deleted the db once and its why I left you the DRMspeedy2 template.
That aside Mugumbo saw several acts of vandalism by IP's addresses 'different' than User:Randel72. Once further investigation was done the IP's originate from the same ISP, and location with in the United States as your account. Your account is also observed as going offline during the times of the changes made by IP: 68.102.222.14 and IP: 68.102.211.12. Not to also mention that the attacks of vandalism were done in fairly regular intervals to the article's history. I should also point out that it's supportive to our argument that the 'unknown' IP addresses also removed the db tags in accordance with your changes while continuing to leave the article intacted.
You have not officially been charged for the vandalism done by the IP Addresses, but the note has been made and if similar instances occur in the future, your account and respective IP Blocks will be banned from the site.
20:25, 2006 October 23 (hist) (diff) User talk:68.102.222.14 ({{drmspeedy3}})
19:46, 2006 October 23 (hist) (diff) User talk:68.102.211.12 (→Mugumbo)
19:45, 2006 October 23 (hist) (diff) User talk:68.102.211.12 (Warning)
19:12, 2006 October 23 (hist) (diff) User talk:Randel72 ({{drmspeedy2}})
Mkdw 16:45, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I did consider that possibility and its why you're only being noted for the two incidences that came from your direct user account Randel72. On Wikipedia we run into several cases where people use mulitple anonyamous IP's to vandalize a single article. The fact that Mugumbo was such a new article and attracted so much traffic from a single ISP in a single location referred to as Wichita, Kansas United States ks.ok.cox.ne usually suggests a single user. More over the article had recieved no attention up until its time of creation so if the word was in high demand, we would have seen signs of it earlier, or more discussion rather than vandalism. Like I said earlier, you are not being held accountable for the vandalism incidences involving the other IP's as we cannot confirm this to Wikipedia standards. I feel at this time this argument has been exhausted and all has been discussed. Continue to contribute to Wikipedia to the best of your abilities while still abiding to its policies, specifically notability guidelines and all should be well. Mkdw 21:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
