Talk:Rail transport in the People's Republic of China
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| See also: WikiProject Trains to do list | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale within the Trains WikiProject. |
 |
This article is maintained by the By country series task force. |
[edit] Cut-and-paste move
I'm afraid there was a cut-and-paste move ([1] [2]). — Instantnood 17:16, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Please update
A railway link to Tibet was recently completed. Please add an updated map plus relevant info. --24.255.155.100 23:47, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pre-ww2 history
The bit about the first trains and being built quasi-legally by Jardine needs sourced statements, please. SchmuckyTheCat 23:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- [3] - You were told that they were translated. It's better to put on the [citation needed] tag than removing the materials (tho it happened at the beginning you were simply reverting for the sake of warring, without noticing them). — Instantnood 13:09, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Unsourced material can be removed by anyone at anytime. Being "a translation" doesn't change that. SchmuckyTheCat 20:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Most of the materials on Wikipedia aren't sourced, yet they can be easily verified, as in the case of what you've removed. Such removings are more like vandalism than anything. The key issue, however, is not with unsourced material, but with your revert warring without paying attention to what other people's edits are about. — Instantnood 20:20, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Liar. Show us where in Wikipedia:Vandalism does it mention the removal of unsourced materials constitutes vandalism.--Huaiwei 21:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- [4] Was user:SchmuckyTheCat actually intending to remove unsourced materials? — Instantnood 21:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please read wp:v again. If you start sourcing edits you won't have much trouble. SchmuckyTheCat 22:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- [4] Was user:SchmuckyTheCat actually intending to remove unsourced materials? — Instantnood 21:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Liar. Show us where in Wikipedia:Vandalism does it mention the removal of unsourced materials constitutes vandalism.--Huaiwei 21:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Most of the materials on Wikipedia aren't sourced, yet they can be easily verified, as in the case of what you've removed. Such removings are more like vandalism than anything. The key issue, however, is not with unsourced material, but with your revert warring without paying attention to what other people's edits are about. — Instantnood 20:20, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Unsourced material can be removed by anyone at anytime. Being "a translation" doesn't change that. SchmuckyTheCat 20:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
