Talk:Radeon R420
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Why I removed the 'Features' section: Nearly all of it can be found verbatim on several sites on google, thus its not original. Even more than that though, it feels too much like whoever wrote it is trying to advertise the Radeon. The rest indeed seems encyclopedic, but as it was the 'Features' were not. Chaz 02:56, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
Firefox: I was not trying to 'advertise' it in any way, I was just stating the features and technology it has.
- Are these specs correct? Radeon X1300 Pixel pipelines: 4 Vertex Processors: 2. That means it has as many pipelines as a Radeon X600! I wonder what the performance is?
Uhh, Psxer, why'd you change all references of Megabyte to Mebibyte?
Contents |
[edit] ATi vs ATI
I changed all the instances of ATi to ATI. I'm a big fan of ATI cards, don't get me wrong, but in print ATI is a lot more readable and typable than ATi. --Alexwcovington (talk) 02:49, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] potential vandalism
an editor may want to check the validity of the information added in this diff, as the author has a record of vandalizing articles. –MT 08:06, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Radeon x800
I made this the Radeon x300-x800 page. The NVIDIA pages are split into core revisions, so I see no reason why ATI should not be styled in the came fashion. Seems reasonably well accepted as a categorisation methodology.
[edit] power consumption
i wonder if anyone could add stats on power consumption for each series? that would be interesting:)
[edit] Keep in mind...
Most of these cards are available in 128/256/512mb flavors, maybe we need to put a disclaimer saying that. I went ahead and changed the X800GTO, cause I personally have a 128mb version of x800gto
