Put–call parity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In financial mathematics, put–call parity defines a relationship between the price of a call option and a put option - both with the identical strike price and expiry. To derive the put-call parity relationship, the assumption is that the options are not exercised before expiration day, which, in the case of European options is necessarily so.

1 Derivation
2 History
3 Implications
4 Other arbitrage relationships
5 Put-call Parity and American Options
6 External links

[edit] Derivation

An example, using stock options follows, though this may be generalised.

Consider a call option and a put option with the same strike K for expiry at the same date T on some stock, which pays no dividend. Let S denote the (unknown) underlying value at expiration.

First consider a portfolio that consists of one put option and one share. This portfolio has value:

Now consider a portfolio that consists of one call option and K bonds that each pay 1 (with certainty) at time T. This portfolio at T has value:

Notice that, whatever the final share price S is at time T, each portfolio is worth the same as the other. This implies that these two portfolios must have the same value at any time t before T. To prove this suppose that, at some time t, one portfolio were cheaper than the other. Then one could purchase (go long) the cheaper portfolio and sell (go short) the more expensive. Our overall portfolio would, for any value of the share price, have zero value at T. We would be left with the profit we made at time t. This is known as a risk-less profit and represents an arbitrage opportunity.

Thus the following relationship exists between the value of the various instruments at a general time $t$ :

$C(t) + K \cdot B(t,T) = P(t)+S(t) \,$

where

C (t)

is the value of the call at time

t

P (t)

is the value of the put,

S (t)

is the value of the share,

K

is the strike price, and

B (t, T)

value of a bond that matures at time

T

. If a stock pays dividends, they should be included in

B (t, T)

, because option prices are typically not adjusted for ordinary dividends.

If the bond interest rate, $r$ , is assumed to be constant then

$B(t,T) = e^{-r(T-t)} \,$ .

Using the above, and given the (fair) value of any three of the call, put, bond and stock prices one can compute the (implied) fair value of the fourth.

[edit] History

Michael Knoll presents evidence that put-call parity may have been used as long ago as ancient Israel in order to avoid the prohibition on usury.

Russell Sage used put-call parity to create synthetic loans, which had higher interest rates than the usury laws of the time would have normally allowed.

Its first description in the "modern" literature appears to be Hans Stoll's paper, The Relation Between Put and Call Prices, from 1969.

[edit] Implications

Put-call parity implies:

1. Equivalence of calls and puts

Parity implies that a call and a put can be used interchangeably in any delta-neutral portfolio. If $d$ is the call's delta, then buying a call, and selling $d$ shares of stock, is the same as buying a put and buying $1 - d$ shares of stock. Equivalence of calls and puts is very important when trading options.

2. Parity of implied volatility

In the absence of dividends or other costs of carry (such as when a stock is difficult to borrow or sell short), the implied volatility of calls and puts must be identical.

[edit] Other arbitrage relationships

Note that there are several other (theoretical) properties of option prices which may be derived via arbitrage considerations. These properties define price limits, the relationship between price, dividends and the risk free rate, the appropriateness of early exercise, and the relationship between the prices of various types of options. See links below.

[edit] Put-call Parity and American Options

For American options, where you have the right to exercise before expiration, this affects the B(t, T) term in the above equation. Put-call parity only holds for American options, if they are not exercised early.

c + PV(x) = p + s