User talk:PureLogic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Heated "Debate"
It will never get any easier to have rational discussion in those pages, though it does happen from time to time. If you haven't been following them long though, you have yet find out that the rules are gamed and policy is routinely violated in order to keep "thought provoking" material out of the articles. Check out this[1] talk page, it's really interesting. Also, if you haven't already, you might want to read through archives of these talk pages and you will get a really good idea of how it works in there and what works and what doesn't. Talk to you later! SkeenaR 23:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
In regards to coordinated intent, you might find this section interesting [2]. Within are some links to a couple of newspaper articles reporting on government policy concerning public perception management in cyberspace. Gulf Islands, cool. Good luck! SkeenaR 03:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
I've requested unprotecting the Sept 11 page. It's overdue to come off and I'm not even sure why it was put there to begin with. That should enable you to edit there. SkeenaR 00:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC) Wait a sec..You mean you are actually not able to edit Talk:Collapse of the World Trade Center because there is no edit button for you? SkeenaR 00:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Your welcome for anything that might have helped. Personally I'm not sure what really happened, but I think this stuff needs to be presented or nothing will ever be resolved. SkeenaR 19:35, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vid
I haven't seen it, but I'll check it out. It looks pretty interesting. Thanks. Here's another interesting one. [3]And nice job on the article. SkeenaR 22:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
There is a Barrie Zwicker article. Try merging the contents together. Also note [4] SkeenaR 03:08, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Zwicker
Actually, if you type barrie zwicker into the search box to the left, you will be taken directly to his page. I wouldn't get too worked up over something like that. The more work you do in this encyclopedia, the more obstacles you will find. But you did do a good job on the article, and actually, there is nothing wrong with the article that was already here, it's got regular status. It was created by Striver on Feb 24 originally looking like this [5] and has expanded to its current form. It was once nominated for deletion, but was kept because there was no consensus to get rid of it. It is also listed here [6] What you should do is take the material out of the article you wrote that is not duplicated in the other article and add it. I would do it a little bit a time due to the apparent sensitivity of some people regarding this subject. SkeenaR 18:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)UTC is Coordinated Universal Time, GMT is Greenwich Mean Time. Where I am it's beer time.
- Hi, just to let you know, I've changed the page you created into a Redirect, so that anyone who types in Barrie Wallace Zwicker in the search box will go automatically to Barrie Zwicker. You can still see what you wrote on that page by looking at the history, or going here, which means you can merge anything from your article into the original as needed. — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 21:12, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- You're welcome. The tradition is to just reply over on the other person's talk page, because, as you said, the person won't otherwise get a notification. Some people copy over the other person's text, which is good for keeping threads together, though gets to be a pain. Some state on their talk pages that they will only answer on their own page, forcing you to remember and go check. I'm not such a fan of the last option, but people can do whatever they want on their own pages. — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 22:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please be more careful
Please be more careful and check that you are not creating material that is already on this encyclopedia; see here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrie Wallace Zwicker.--Jersey Devil 08:44, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Double voting
Dear PureLogic,
You currently have cast two "Keep" votes on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9/11 Truth Movement. If this was accidental, can you change one of the "Keep" votes into a "Comment"? Thanks, Andjam 09:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
