User talk:Psychonaut
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Remember to sign your posts by adding four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
Contents |
[edit] Be careful
Listen mister, do not vandalize other people's work. John Hyams 23:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Please discuss my issue with "your work" on the article talk page. —Psychonaut 23:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] db-userreq
Hello Psychonaut, I see you have requested your userpage be deleted, may I please inquire as to why? I can have it deleted for you but I am curious, and somewhat concerned, that something has happened I am unaware of that I may also address for you. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge aka "Wiz" (Talk to Me) (Support Neutrality) 23:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- What, you're an admin now? I want the user page deleted because its history contains objectionable and personally identifying statements made by a vandal. —Psychonaut 23:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
::Can you identify what diffs? The diffs themselves can be deleted without having to delete the whole page, or the page can be undeleted without the offending diffs. And no, I'm not an admin (at least not as of now) but I keep in contact with many sysops (and crats) on IRC. ✎ Peter M Dodge aka "Wiz" (Talk to Me) (Support Neutrality) 00:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Seem to be okay now I guess, sorry to be a bother :) Let me know if I ever can be of help. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge aka "Wiz" (Talk to Me) (Support Neutrality) 00:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nice job!
Just wanted to say I thought you conducted yourself very well and maintained your temper in Talk:International_Conference_to_Review_the_Global_Vision_of_the_Holocaust. Kudos to you! Dkostic 02:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Courtesy Warning
Just a courtesy message that I complained about you and other vandals on this board. This is a warning.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User_Coredesat_.2C_User_JDoorjam_.2C_and_User_Psychonaut —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bosniak (talk • contribs) 02:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Srebrenica massacre
I am glad to see that some more people are getting involved in the Srebrenica massacre article.
While not massively factually incorrect it is marred by a POV selection and presentation of events. Left unchecked, the Bosniak editors active in editing the article (one of who you have already made the acquintance of, aptly named Bosniak) will, and have, turned it into a political issue rather than a historical/current events one. They are quite ready to bully/attack anyone who opposes thir presentation of event. Like you, I have been labelled a "genocide denier", "Serb apologist", "nationalist Serb" and so on.
The copyright issues with the text (of which I believe a lot is a cut and paste job from the icty judgement against Krstic) and the photos (which are probably AP or some other news agency, hardly private or for free) are an additional problem.KarlXII 08:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
