Talk:Psychiatric survivors movement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

article is neutral, it describes "Psychiatric survivors movement" and what it is about. It does not appear to have a "pro" or "con" bias. If someone wanted to read the other side of the coin then one should look for that.

Might discuss criticisms of movement by Satel and others, along with "psychiatric survivors'" response to such criticisms. --Daniel C. Boyer 19:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] cleanup

The beginning still needs it. Midgley 22:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bias

Smacks of bias and agenda, which is more about skewing the delivery of objective information than truly about sharing knowledge on a level playing field. This in contrary to the point of Wikipedia. Either the article should have a rewrite to be fair to psychiatry while objectively describing the movement against it, or it should be considered for removal.

Barry 1:24 PST, June 11 2006

I think this (the bias) might well be true, but to suggest removing the article on this important and significant subject smacks of a bias of its own. --Daniel C. Boyer 19:13, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

The language of the article itself seems fairly nuetral, but some of it needs more qualification. Removed quotation marks from "help". Added some words to denote speaker. Changed "torture" to some other words. --Zach Chidester 08:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)