Wikipedia:Proseline
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an essay. It is not a policy or guideline. Please update the page as needed, or discuss it on the talk page. |
As an encyclopedia that can be edited at any moment by anyone anywhere, Wikipedia has the unique ability of being able to have an article written on a particular current event merely hours, or even minutes, after the event occurs. Unfortunately, the inevitable scramble to add up-to-the-minute information to appropriate articles can often result in something we shall call proseline (prōz'līn', pl. proseline) – segments of articles that attempt to be (and should be) prose, but end up looking like timelines. Being comprehensive and up-to-date is perfectly reasonable and okay to a point, but proseline tends to degrade the quality of the articles in which they reside by interrupting the natural flow with unnecessarily choppy sentences and paragraphs.
Contents |
[edit] The origin of proseline
As the introduction says, proseline originates from a scramble to add new information to articles as soon as they happen. An editor normally will not add new information in the form of entire paragraphs or sections because either...
- an editor feels he or she just has to be first to add this new event and writing a complete paragraph would allow another editor to beat him or her
- an editor does not have the time or desire to elaborate further
...or most commonly...
- there just is not enough information available to write anything beyond a On Date X, Event Y happened.
Sometimes waiting for a story to develop will prevent proseline (and also false information) from entering articles on Wikipedia, but the tendency to keep Wikipedia current is irresistible to many. If I decide to wait for more information, one thinks, someone else will add it anyway. Thus, I might as well add it myself.
[edit] How does one spot proseline?
There are normally two types of proseline:
- Most often proseline can be detected as a series of one-sentence paragraphs that each contain a date or year.
- Sometimes proseline is a bit more sneaky, however, showing up as bulleted lists.
-
- This second type of proseline is a problem because we have an unenumerated list where an actual paragraph of prose would do.
- In fact, this very section is self-referential, as it is an example of proseline in itself.
[edit] What proseline is not
The endorsement of the elimination of proseline should not translate to an endorsement of the elimination of timelines on Wikipedia. There is no cut-and-dried formula for when timelines are appropriate, but if a vast amount of basic chronological information is available and one takes great care, encyclopedic and informational timelines could be created (see Timeline of the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy or Timeline of the September 11, 2001 attacks). Perhaps one way to help determine the appropriateness of a timeline is to think about the degree to which the reader will benefit from knowing the exact date, time, and order of events.
In regards to the second form of proseline, one must remember that proseline is not simply short sentences; varying sentence length in any piece of writing is allowed and encouraged. People on Wikipedia, in academia, and elsewhere often make the mistake that long sentences are a sign the writer knows what he or she is talking about. Not true at all. Proseline only appears when there is a great absence of transition between adjacent sentences, and a lack of connectedness within a given paragraph, section, or article.
[edit] What should be done?
In short, the best way to deal with proseline is to convert it to either prose or a timeline, depending on which is more appropriate. Perhaps you could try combining a section of proseline into paragraph and prose form just to see what happens. For example, note how the second section of this essay could have easily been written in prose:
- There are normally two types of proseline. Most often proseline can be detected as a series of one-sentence paragraphs that each contain a date or year. Sometimes proseline is a bit more sneaky, however, showing up as bulleted lists. This second type of proseline is a problem because we have an unenumerated list where an actual paragraph of prose would do. In fact, this very section is self-referential, as it is an example of proseline in itself.
Regardless, avoid leaving sections and articles as just series of short sentences without bullets. If a list is beginning to form, make a list with bullets (asterisks [*] in wiki-markup); that contributes to the coherence and organization of the associated article, even if ultimately the section should end up as prose.
[edit] See also
- Wikipedia:Recentism – the uncle of proseline, recentism is the tendency to give undue weight to recent events
