Proper map

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, a continuous function between topological spaces is called proper if inverse images of compact subsets are compact. In algebraic geometry, a related concept is used.

Contents

[edit] Topological spaces

[edit] Definition

A function f : XY between two topological spaces is proper if and only if the preimage of every compact set in Y is compact in X.

An equivalent, possibly more intuitive definition is as follows: We say an infinite sequence of points {pi} in a topological space X escapes to infinity if, for every compact set SX, only finitely many points pi are in S. Then a map f : XY is proper if and only if, for every sequence of points {pi} that escapes to infinity in X, {f(pi)} escapes to infinity in Y.

[edit] Properties

[edit] Algebraic varieties and schemes

[edit] Definition

A morphism f : XY of algebraic varieties or schemes is called universally closed if all its fiber products f × Id: X × ZY × Z are closed maps of the underlying topological spaces. A morphism f : XY of algebraic varieties or is called proper if it is separated and universally closed. A morphism of schemes is called proper if it is separated, of finite type and universally closed ([EGA] II, 5.4.1 [1]). One also says that X is proper over Y. A variety X over a field k is complete when the constant morphism from X to a point is proper.

A morphism f : XY of algebraic varieties over the field of complex numbers C induces a continuous function

f(\mathbf{C}): X(\mathbf{C}) \to Y(\mathbf{C})

between their sets of complex points with their complex topology (see GAGA). It can be shown that f is a proper morphism if and only if f(C) is a proper continuous function.

Properness is a local property that is stable under base change. The composition of two proper morphisms is proper.

[edit] Examples

The projective space Pd over a field K is proper, over a point (that is, Spec(K)). In the more classical language, this is the same as saying that projective space is a complete variety. Projective morphisms are proper, but not all proper morphisms are projective. Closed immersions are proper. More generally, finite morphisms are proper.

Affine varieties of non-zero dimension are never proper. For example, it is not hard to see that the affine line A1 is not proper. In fact the map taking A1 to a point x is not universally closed. For example, the morphism f × Id: A1 × A1 → {x} × A1 is not closed since the image of the hyperbola uv = 1, which is closed in A1 × A1, is the affine line minus the origin and thus not closed.

[edit] Valuative criterion of properness

There is a very intuitive criterion for properness which goes back to Chevalley. It is commonly called the valuative criterion of properness. Let f: XY be a morphism of finite type, with X noetherian. Then f is proper if and only if for all valuation rings R with fields of fractions K all K-valued points xX(K) that map to a point f(x) that is defined over R there is a unique lift of x to \overline{x} \in X(R). (EGA II, 7.3.8 [2])

For example, the projective line is proper over a field (or even over Z) since one can always scale homogeneous co-ordinates by their least common denominator.

[edit] Stein factorization

A deep property of proper morphisms is the existence of a Stein factorization, namely the existence of an intermediate scheme such that a morphism can be expressed as one with connected fibres, followed by a finite morphism. (EGA III, 4.3.3 [3])

[edit] See also