User talk:Pquentinj

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Pquentinj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  hydnjo talk 13:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of unaccredited institutions of higher learning

You have now added the same content twice, both times without edit summaries, and ignoring the point made in the edit summary when your edit was reverted that this special pleading has already been removed by consensus following other discussions. There is no valid principled objection to accreditation, numerous seminaries and Christian colleges are accredited through TRACS, a body set up for that specific purpose. Please take it to the talk page rather than simply reverting. Just zis Guy you know? 18:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

User:Pquentinj, the problem is your adding POV. If you wish to add something surrounding accreditation it should come from a source, preferably an academic source (which is what accreditation is). Until you support claims with facts your edits are considered POV. Once cited they should be judged for validity and value based on the content and source. Also please stop adding links as if they are wiki-links, relevant links should be at the bottom of the page or at the end of the sentence. Arbusto 04:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Please do not attempt to whitewash unaccredited schools. Not only is this considered vandalism, there is strong precedent for Wikipedia ensuring that potential students are not misled since these school shave historically gone to great lengths to disguise and gloss over their lack of accreditation. You do not WP:OWN the article, it belongs to Wikipedia, and neutral point of view means stating all sides factually, not excising criticism. Just zis Guy you know? 08:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I acknowledge your point regarding "ownership" and am not suggesting otherwise. However, on this list, you are excluding a "fair" point of view that is at odds with your own agenda. That is hardly a "neutral" position. In fact, my additiond to your list page are exactly what you encourage elsewhere, a "criticism" of its content, a corrective that allows for "all sides" to state their view "factually." Although some schools have sought to "disguise and gloss over their lack of accreditation," it is wrong to suggest that all schools are in this camp.
What agenda would that be? I wasn't aware I had one. Just zis Guy you know? 18:35, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Whitefield College

Your reversions of material unflattering to this school are becoming tiresome. Please discuss it on the Talk page, and use edit syummaries when editing. If you continue reverting to a whitewashed version you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia, as this is considered as vandalism. Just zis Guy you know? 18:37, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I am using the talk page of the school, please see my comments there

Ditto Association of Christian Schools International. Just zis Guy you know? 18:53, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sproul Jr.

Please lend your thoughts to Talk:R. C. Sproul, Jr.#Unencyclopedic content?. --Flex 20:17, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/q/u/User_talk%7EPquentinj_c10f.html"