Talk:Positivity/negativity ratio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Talk:Positivity
Asked context was already given on February 26, 2006. Is it better now?
Isn't this just original research? The author seems to be using wikipedia for self-promotion... Note his paper with Frederickson suggests the need for a "theory of positivity" and then leaps into 7 predictions, skipping over what that theory might be or how it might be validated.