Talk:Positivity/negativity ratio

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Talk:Positivity

Asked context was already given on February 26, 2006. Is it better now?


Isn't this just original research? The author seems to be using wikipedia for self-promotion... Note his paper with Frederickson suggests the need for a "theory of positivity" and then leaps into 7 predictions, skipping over what that theory might be or how it might be validated.