Talk:Plesk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you enter incorrect password for more than 3 - 4 times, the account gets locked for half hour to one hour. What I want to know is that is this facility given by PLESK Control Panel or is it dependent on the WebServer ? [ which is just controlled by the Plesk UI ] The Plesk software controls the timeout, not the server OS. However, here isn't the right place to discuss this. Try the SWsoft fora instead.

Contents

[edit] NPOV

The article on Plesk seems to be (indirectly) advertising the SWsoft company and its products. Please make changes and consider revising the article. Teckie 02:34, 15 April 2006 (UTC)


the article seems factual to me


[edit] Seems NPOV to me

It is a factual reperesentation of the Plesk product, with historical insight into the development of software technology in a remote region of the world. I have been a Plesk user for less than 1 week, and have no fiduciary link to Plesk or any competitor.

[edit] NPOV

The article is factual and unbiased. Had there been / if there is a page for cPanel, it'd probably read similarly. I work for a company that resells Plesk, and not one word of it that I have read is untrue or undiscoverable by researching elsewhere via Google. In fact, although I am not the original author, I cannot think of any changes that will still convey a truthful description of Plesk. You write, "Please make changes," but then fail to offer ideas as to how to change it yourself. Remember this is a WIKI, and anyone can change anything at anytime.


The bit about programming remotely is somewhat off-topic, but the article looks fine. What's not NPOV about it? One-dimensional Tangent (Talk) 00:19, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License?

This article doesn't discuss Plesk's license. It seems like a glaring omission. I added the word 'commercial' in front of the words 'web hosting application' to make this clearer. After reading Plesk's license agreement on SWsoft's homepage I am confident that the word is appropriate.

[edit] Stub?

I would say this is still a stub... should a stub template be added? Tim 06:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)