Talk:Playing with Fire (Kevin Federline album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Playing with Fire (Kevin Federline album) article.
Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~). New discussion topics go at the bottom of the page; click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Frequently asked questions. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Talk page guidelines Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Don't bite the newcomers!

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

OOoooweee I can't wait for this album to drop. It's gonna be FIRE! --Glaze 18:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• I might grab my socks, cause he's from freZ-No Hackajar 06:48, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

i added the album cover, but i might have uploaded it improperly. please fix it if u can.

[edit] NPOV

The article reads like a press release (it probably is copied from it). Maybe someone can fix it up and add a history of the album and the cancelled tracks. Leeferdude 21:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC) This album is just like the person who sang it, WHITE TRASH!!!!!!! KFed should not be singing it looks like the only thing he is good at is making babies, free loading, and abandoning his family for another.

The above comment is very true. Someone who is apparently from Federline's camp is removing negative reviews which reflect the majority opinion about the record. Also they insist on maintaining a falsehood that "initial criticism has been mixed at best". This is simply false. Any survey of reviews will show the vast majority are very negative, usually in the single star range. Rolling Stone is typical of major publications which called Playing With Fire in the first line of its review as "reprehensible". Every time this false statement is corrected it reappears. Wikipedia is not a propaganda vehicle for media products that receive disasterous receptions to be spun as being better received than they were.

Dude, relax. You're Playing With Fire.

That was hilarious and terrible. -- Kicking222 17:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)