From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spiders, a collaborative effort to improve and expand Wikipedia's coverage of spiders. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion. |
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
|
Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
As the project is currently just starting, our more experienced editors are working on the project infrastructure, classifying articles, and listing/assessing red links. You can join the project, or just check out what can be done. Your assistance is welcome!
- Clean up the article Spiders. (find "storyline", equal level of depth of information)
- Check out if pages are named correctly, eg.:
- several family pages seem to have names that only apply to a subset of the family. --Sarefo 02:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Move pictures from en:Wikipedia to WikiCommons, eg.:
-
- Translate pages from other WPs into English
- Expand the following articles (and many, many more):
-
If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list and add your achievement to the project log.
|
[edit] Venomous genera within family Ctenidae?
From what I've read the genus Phoneutria is the only genus within the family Ctenidae that has potent enough bite and venom to be a real danger to humans, is it known if any of the other genera of that family really do have as potent of venom? --Fxer 06:37, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] merge with Brazlian wandering spider
The article Brazilian wandering spider describes the entire genus Phoneutria in much greater detail than this article. I propose merging (better yet, deleting and redirecting) this with that article. --EngineerScotty 22:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
