Portal:Philosophy of science

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

edit  

The Philosophy of Science Portal

Philosophy of science is the branch of philosophy that studies the philosophical assumptions, foundations, and implications of science, including the formal sciences, natural sciences, and social sciences. In this respect, the philosophy of science is closely related to epistemology and the philosophy of language. Note that issues of scientific ethics are not usually considered to be part of the philosophy of science; they are studied in such fields as bioethics and science studies.

In particular, the philosophy of science considers the following topics:

  • The character and the development of concepts and terms, propositions and hypotheses, arguments and conclusions, as they function in science.
  • The manner in which science explains natural phenomena and predicts natural occurrences.
  • The types of reasoning that are used to arrive at scientific conclusions.
  • The formulation, scope, and limits of scientific method.
  • The means that should be used for determining when scientific information has adequate objective support.
  • The implications of scientific methods and models, along with the technology that arises from scientific knowledge, for the larger society.
More about the philosophy of science...
Show new selections
edit  

Selected article

The duck-rabbit optical illusion.
An epistemological paradigm shift was called a scientific revolution by epistemologist and historian of science Thomas Kuhn in his book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.

A scientific revolution occurs, according to Kuhn, when scientists encounter anomalies which cannot be explained by the universally accepted paradigm within which scientific progress has thereto been made. The paradigm, in Kuhn's view, is not simply the current theory, but the entire worldview in which it exists, and all of the implications which come with it. There are anomalies for all paradigms, Kuhn maintained, that are brushed away as acceptable levels of error, or simply ignored and not dealt with – a principal argument Kuhn uses to reject Karl Popper's model of falsifiability as the key force involved in scientific change.

edit  

Selected picture

Plato's allegory of the cave
Credit: Mats Halldin

Plato's Allegory of the Cave is perhaps the best known of his many allegories, metaphors, and parables. The allegory is told and interpreted at the beginning of Book 7 of Republic (514A–520A).

edit  

Categories

edit  

Selected biography

Popper's image on the Bryan Magee book, Popper
Karl Popper (1902-1994) was an Austrian and British philosopher, counted among the most influential philosophers of science of the 20th century. His book The Logic of Scientific Discovery criticises psychologism, naturalism, inductionism, and logical positivism, and puts forth his theory of potential falsifiability being the criterion for what should be considered science.

He coined the term critical rationalism to describe his theory, rejecting classical empiricism, and holding that scientific theories are universal in nature, and can only be tested indirectly, with reference to their implications. He also held that scientific theory, and human knowledge generally, is irreducibly conjectural or hypothetical, and is generated by the creative imagination in order to solve problems that have arisen in specific historico-cultural settings.

edit  

Did you know...

The EPR thought experiment, performed with electrons. A source (center) sends electrons toward two observers, Alice (left) and Bob (right), who can perform spin measurements.
...that a thought experiment uses a hypothetical scenario to help us understand things through a priori, rather than empirical methodology. It does not use observation or physical experiment. Understanding comes through reflection on the situation.

...that the philosophy of biology has matured greatly since the rise of Neodarwinism in the 1930s and 1940s, the discovery of the structure of Deoxyribonucleic acid in 1953, and more recent advances in genetic engineering.
...that Occam's razor argues the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating, or "shaving off," those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory?

edit  

WikiProjects

edit  

Topics

Philosophy of science: Biology • Chemistry • Information • Language • Logic • Mathematics (Education, Probability) • Mind (Artificial intelligence, Perception) • Physics (Space & time, Thermal & statistical physics) • Social sciences (Environment, Psychology) • Technology

Plato at the School of Athens

Epistemology: A priori and a posteriori • Analysis • Analytic-synthetic distinction • Belief • Causality • Coherentism • Constructivist epistemology • Contextualism • Descriptive knowledge • Determinism (Scientific) • Empiricism • Faith and rationality • Fallibilism • Foundationalism • Gettier problem • Holism • Infinitism • Innatism • Internalism and externalism • Knowledge • Objectivity • Positivism • Proposition • Rationalism • Reductionism • Regress argument • Reliabilism • Simplicity • Skepticism • Speculative reason • Theaetetus (dialogue) • Theory of forms • Theory of justification • Transcendental idealism • Truth • Uniformitarianism • Vitalism

Ontology: Being • Category of being • Change • Cogito ergo sum • Dualism • Embodied philosophy • Entity • Existence • Existentialism • Identity • Physical object • Properties • Reality • Relativism • Scientific realism • Subjectivism • Substance theory • Type theory • Universal • Unobservables

Anti-psychiatry • Demarcation problem • Evolution • Free will • History of science • Pseudoscience • Rhetoric of science • Scientific method • Scientism • Sociology of scientific knowledge

edit  

Quote

   
Portal:Philosophy of science
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
   
Portal:Philosophy of science
edit  

Things you can do

edit  

Related portals

edit  

Associated Wikimedia