Talk:Phat pants
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
PHAT PANTS ARE WORN BY GUYS, NOT GIRLS - THEY ARE A GUYS FASHION NOT GIRLS. ==
If you go to certain clubs in Australia they are filled with females wearing phat pants. If you check out the second link at the bottom of the article it has a female in phats. User:kobo 14:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
What are you saying that Guys dont wear them, I think you will find that guys do wear them. Guys ones are much baggier than females, guys ones drag all over the floor and completely cover the shoes. Girld dont even cover the shoes.
- Guys wear phat pants. This can be shown by following link 1 http://caseyporn.com/blog/archives/000251.html (Guy Talking About His Phat Pants)
- Girls also wear phat pants. This can be shown by following the links on the page such as link 2 http://www.theage.com.au/news/fashion/rave-reviews/2005/08/26/1124563029403.html (Article in Australian newspaper The Age talking about phat pants) and link 3 http://www.metrotimes.com/editorial/story.asp?id=1059 (Article in Metro Times of Detroit with women talking about clothing, including their phatties.)
- Phat pants are a distinct cut as described in the first line of the article "a style of pants that are fitted at the hips and widen all the way down to the ground enclosing the feet due to their width. " This cut can be seen in photos in link 1 and link 4 http://www.psydeways.com/ (Website of store selling phat pants).
- Phat pants are still the same distinct cut whether worn by a guy or a girl as shown in the photo gallery of the store in link 5 http://www.psydeways.com/photos/ (Photo gallery of store selling phat pants. Contains phat pants for guys and girls and shows they are the same distinct cut.)
- Pants that are fitted from the hips to the knees then widen out from the knees to the feet are called flares as described in the "not to be confused with" section.
Tiggertrouble 01:42, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed Merger with Pants
I think this page should be merged with Pants - could be expanded on pants page User:SimontheRaver
- Support Addhoc 11:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support User:Biscuit_brain 11:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re Picture
I am a little annoyed that it wasn't discussed that the other picture was going to be put up - as soon as I put up a gender-free one it is removed. Now, I am not screwed in the head like Simon the Raver and his many other names, but I do take offense to an issue like the one I have brought up, the image I uploaded is gender-neutral and should be left as it is. User:Bisuit brain 21st November 2006.
User:Bisuit brain the only edits you have been making are destructive edits in the same manner and to the same page as the vandalistic editor User:Simon the Raver who you claim not to be. You have lied about the source of an image in order to justify removing it, claiming there was no source when it's source was clearly stated and the image was released into the public domain. You are also insisting that any image that happens to have a female in it must be replaced by a picture with a male in it in the interest of "gender neutrality". Please stop lying, attempting to confuse things by making edits that go around in a circle, and unnecessarily pushing your gender isssues. Tiggertrouble 00:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
P.S. let me state again both females and males wear phat pants.
phat pants boy forums are a forum for sick people. do not go there.