Talk:Peugeot 205

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stephane Sarrazain, Monte Carlo 2005 This article is part of WikiProject World Rally, an effort to create, expand and improve World Rally Championship -related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more information.
Former FA This article is a former featured article candidate. Please view its sub-page to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Dispute NPOV on the comment 'King of the GTIs'! While this was certainly one of the finest hot hatches of the era, a nod should be given to its direct competitor, the faster Renault 5 GT Turbo. The Mk.1 Golf was a revoluntionary car, which started the hot hatch era. The 205 GTI was merely a fine example from the crowd of vehicles that followed, including the Vauxhall Nova GSi/GSE, Ford Fiesta XR2/RS Turbo and so on. akaDruid 11:16, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I own a 205GTi and have previously owned 2 Renault 11 Turbos, which have the same engine as the 5GT but in a larger shell. This isn't encyclopedic of course - I'm just saying :) - but they are very different driving experiences. The Renault was like a rocket, an exhilirating "racing" car but with rather dodgy handling. The GTi is all about cornering; it's more of a rally experience. Whereas the Renault was all about top speed and the incredibly exciting turbo lag/whistle, the Peugeot is at home on twisting country lanes. Both tremendous vehicles of course. My 205 until recently had never failed to start first time, and I'm feeling a little guilty about leaving that emerging classic on the drive at home and probably rotting away :( To do! --kingboyk 22:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] POV

I have removed 'king of the GTis' as this is a POV statement. --TheM62Manchester 10:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Writing style

"The 205 GRD (1.8 Diesel, 59 bhp, 78 lb/ft), for instance, was as fast yet smoother than the 205 GR (1.4 Petrol, 59 bhp, 78 lb/ft - yup, same figures but the diesel was torquier lower down) while using much less fuel." - doesn't seem very formally written. GBM 00:59, 26 October 2006 (UTC)