User talk:Petros471
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello! Welcome to my talk page, feel free to leave a message for me at the bottom of this page, using a new heading for new topics. Please try and use descriptive headers, as it helps with my archiving (I reserve the right to change the header for this purpose).
Useful links (either for you or myself): Old userpage | Block log (Blocked) | Deletion log | Protection log | RFA voting rationale | RFA reviews subpage | To-do
[edit] Archives
- Full archive index of old conversations. If you wish to re-start any conversation from in here please start a new heading on this page.
- Quick links: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
- From the editor: New feature
- Board of Trustees expanded as three new members are appointed
- Wikimedia Foundation releases financial audit
- Arbitration Committee elections continue, extra seat available
- Female-only wiki mailing list draws fire
- Trolling organization's article deleted
- WikiWorld comic: "Redshirt"
- News and notes: Fundraiser plans, milestones
- Wikipedia in the News
- Features and admins
- Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Contents |
[edit] UPA
Hi! Whilst it was fun being overseer for the award, it would be lovely if you now resumed you previous and rightful position :). Thanks and kind regards, —Celestianpower háblame 18:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm trying (pretty successfully!) to be inactive on Wikipedia at the moment, but I suppose being coordinator for a round or two isn't too much work. Let me know when the current round is finished and I'll do the next one. Petros471 15:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Taarma (Black Emperor Jogezai) (band)
they're a signed band with a album (Remnants of a Tormenting Black Shadow) due to be released 2007. he's established an advant-garde new style of music (Has established a tradition or school in a particular genre). how do you undelete the article?
http://www.freewebs.com/taarma/main.htm http://www.legionofdeath.cjb.net/ http://www.metal-archives.com/band.php?id=58400 Cannibaltom 01:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- I've undeleted the article (as it is now a disputed WP:PROD). Please note that the article may still be nominated for deletion via the articles for deletion process. Let me know if you have any further questions. Cheers, Petros471 15:53, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:68.192.166.183
Blocked by yourself for persistent vandalism (automotive and Japanese manga/anime articels). Same pages are now being vandalised the same way by User:24.46.255.158. I did a blanket revert of all edits in the meantime, but didn't bother posting a warning as seemed pointless. --DeLarge 23:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please see WP:AIV for vandalism reports (I'm basically inactive at the moment). Petros471 15:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] November Esperanza Newsletter
|
|
|
[edit] Survey Q
Have you ever been to the southern hemisphere? Respond here Deadline for entries is December 15th, PST. AstroBoy 03:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sunderland Message Board
Would dispute deletion of this page relating to the largest supporters' group of Sunderland AFC.
As pointed out in the deletion discussion:
1) Group has been misconstrued as just existing as a message board. Group started from a message board, hence the origins of the acronym SMB. 2) Sufficient argument was made to establish notability, no reason was given to dispute this. Decision to delete not based on consensus in the discussion. 3) Why just this group? - do a search on "football supporters clubs" and there are hundreds. All for deletion?
Conclude that the article should have been marked for clean-up (to make it clear that SMB referred to a physical group), not deletion. Would request restoration.Cathd6 12:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC) I should have said "thank you" - and just to let you know that I've noted you're busy so I'll give it a couple of weeks before taking it for general discussion. cheers! Cathd6
- That article was deleted as a result of a WP:AFD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunderland Message Board, rather than a speedy or proposed deletion. I interpreted the consensus (taking into account arguments rather than simple votes) of the discussion to be delete. I still stand by that decision, however you are welcome to request a deletion review of that decision to see if the community agrees with you. Petros471 17:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)