From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.
Request reason: "Net snipe is a bully who is victimising me he should have his admin removed and some one different should review my case who is not emotionally involved his "case" against me is a pack of lies."
Decline reason: "There is no chance of you getting unblocked because there is indisputable evidence of your sockpuppet violation displayed here; and I find that your user name is entirely inappropriate.--Konstable 11:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC)"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
|
|
Blocked as a sockpuppet
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user and for vandalism. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All your edits have been reverted.
To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|reason}} on this page, replacing reason with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.
Netsnipe ► 12:51, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
|
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.
Request reason: "what is a sock puppet? i have done nothing wrong please unblock me my brother logged on as me and mucked up my profile this all a big misunderstanding please unblock me i wilol change my pass so it does not happen again"
Decline reason: "Sockpuppetry confirmed per Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hunter91 -- Netsnipe ► 15:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Hi im 44 and still live with my mother and work as a nursery worker.Peter file 10:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Muslim (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 10:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
This was not a misunderstanding. Blanking pages/removing content is considered to be vandalism.
Template:Wr — ERcheck (talk) 11:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Unterseeboot 973. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — ERcheck (talk) 11:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you deliberately introduce incorrect information into a page, as you did to Rome: Total War, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — ERcheck (talk) 11:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
point noted it was a accident though and my edit to RTW was a valid one that site has nothing to do with RTW if you cant back up your claims dont make them.
- A "See also" link to another Wikipedia article that relates to a similar game is appropriate. See also is for giving related reading within Wikipedia. You have been warned about removing warning messages from your talk page. You may comment on them, but you may not remove them. If you do this again, you will be blocked. — ERcheck (talk) 11:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
