Talk:Pete Doherty/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

I rated this article as B-Class, because it basically meets the criteria for a good article:

  • It is readily comprehensible to readers unfamiliar with the topic;
  • it is structured (contains a lead section, has subtitles, etc.);
  • it basically follows the Wikipedia Manual of Style;
  • it provides reference to reliable sources;
  • it addresses all major aspects of the topic;
  • it follows the neutral point of view policy.

However, there's a lot to do. Weak points of the article:

  • I expect it to still be full of spelling mistakes, because attentive readers frequently find some;
  • It barely contains pictures;
  • Many passages contain too many unnecessary details;
  • There's always a bunch of uncertain information solely based on rumours around. (At least it is always phrased as such.)

and, which is not really a weakness, but still, the article is not stable, not at all.

-- dreadlady 15:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Surely this article needs to be re-evaluated? I mean, the weak points have been generally rectified and the general look has been greatly improved. A-class status is surely deserved?
--Leowatkins 20:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/e/t/Talk%7EPete_Doherty_Comments_b775.html"