User talk:Pertn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Welcome to Wikipedia 2 Message Replies 3 3RR 4 NAS 5 Ben's "big three issues" with NAS article

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome, Pertn!

Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:

• First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
• When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
• If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
• Wikipedia has a vibrant community of editors. The village pump is a great place to see the goings on.
• Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Also, here are some pointers to learn more about this project:

• Wikipedia:Five pillars
• Wikipedia:Policy trifecta
• Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
• Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages
• Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.

You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.

Best of luck, and have fun editing! ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 15:33, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Message Replies

I agree that Bateson is unclear, and I don't think this can be settled without the original reference. I've added a comment to that effect in Talk:Gregory Bateson#Difference in Information or Bit.3F. If we could tag it with something like Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup#Verifiability and sources, then I'd be happy to leave it as-is for now. (I think it's an important quote and it's worth the effort to get it right.) Vagary 21:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

As you're reverting a lot at New anti-Semitism, I want to make sure you've been told about the 3RR rule. Any undoing of another editor's work, in whole or in part, whether involving the same material or different material each time, is a revert; and only three of those are allowed in 24 hours. Please review WP:3RR carefully. Many thanks, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 16:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Duh.pertn 18:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NAS

Thank you. [1] SlimVirgin ^(talk) 22:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ben's "big three issues" with NAS article

Going forward, I suggest a focus on dealing with these three issues with the NAS article. If we can effectively tackle these at least my concerns over the article will be addressed. My "big three issues" with the NAS articles are as follows:

• Neutering critics
• Confusing evidence with NAS's interpretation
• Article is about modern NAS theory, not term

What do you think? --Ben Houston 22:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)