User talk:Perrymason

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(see: block log • contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

I have unprotected the user page so you may dispute your block. I will lock it again if you use it as a platform for more threats or attacks. Gamaliel 22:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

thanks for unblocking this page, but no way should it of been blocked in the first place and i think its BS that you and that other guy were attacking me for nothing (note, in the past i have caused no problems, i only started getting abusive after that other guy and you were screwing me about).

just because your admins it doesnt mean you can troll and abuse users.

seeing how wiki can be abused by admins on a power trip makes me sick, i used to think wiki was where everyone was allowed to edit, i personally think i did a good job making my perversions of science page since i dont really know how to edit on here but im not doing jack anymore.

you can delete me or block me or whatever now. I can understand why and i think thats fair enough. Perrymason 22:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

You were blocked for violating a Wikipedia policy, WP:3RR. Once blocked you insulted and threatened the editor who blocked you. There is no "power trip" involved in blocking those who threaten and insult others. Gamaliel 22:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] unfairly attacked by an admin

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.

Request reason: "I would just like this reviewed by another admin"

Decline reason: "no way--Konst.able 04:13, 12 October 2006 (UTC)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

I think it is very unfair that the admin i have problems with can abuse their power and target me unfairly. Another admin (a 3rd party) should be involved when people have problems with a certain admin.

Why are they allowed to attack me and then when i revert the page, i gets blocked by the admin but they do not get blocked for doing the same?

I was unfairly targeted by this admin who was trying to force their censorship onto me. They kept editing my pages and attacking me, I kept away from the admin and didnt trash their pages or anything.

What's the betting they will still try to get involved and hassle me?

I just want to make minor edits to various pages (i admit im a basic user here) without being hassled by this certain administrator.

Of course, if in the future i screw up, i expect to have a warning from an admin or whatever but i just dont want it to be from the one who was attacking me for no real reason because if they start the same stupid stuff all over again, of course i will be threating them.

This part of wiki policy, describes what i mean: Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#When_blocking_may_not_be_used - the admin in question used their power to gain an advantage in a dispute


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.

Request reason: "my problem was unresolved and it also looks like somebody has deleted all my old complaints, mmmmm..."

Decline reason: "no way--WinHunter (talk) 04:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Edit-conflicted review: The page was deleted due to inactivity, not out of any particular malice. I've undeleted the history, since it seems pertinent. Given your past abuse (linked already), I'm very much disinclined to even look into this any further without a more complete explanation on your part. Sorry. Luna Santin 04:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

wiki said i also had a message but i went to click it and it went to an error page and then the message box disappeared.


"no way" ?!?!?!?! oh, that explains it all away then. forget i was unfairly targeted by a admin with an agenda who broke more rules than i did yet went unpunished or even questioned (Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#When_blocking_may_not_be_used)

thanks for the info "Luna Santin".

i guess its a new ip and username - im sure you cannot detect that. yes im sure its against the rules, but what other option do i have?

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/e/r/User_talk%7EPerrymason_9383.html"