User talk:Perpetual motion machine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Perpetual motion machine, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Merovingian {T C @} 13:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Infoboxes

I like 'em. Did User:Omegatron really revert one of these, or was that a goof? ---CH 14:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] POV of Philosophus

Template:Perpetual motion machine

Please stop changing this template without discussing the changes first. I don't understand why you keep doing this. Perpetual motion machine is by far the more commonly used term. --Philosophus T 13:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop POVing this template (See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). This is a neutral term. Perpetual motion machine is by far from a neutral term. Perpetual motion machine 13:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Free energy machine is a far from unambiguous name (Gibbs?, Helmholtz?...) and not suitable. --Michael C. Price talk 16:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reversions and 3RR

Please stop making your usual reversions (like Cox's timepiece). If you continue doing so, you may be blocked for WP:3RR violation. Please note that changes advancing NPOV are not exempt from 3RR. --Philosophus T 14:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

You continue doing so (making "your usual reversions").

You also may be blocked for WP:3RR violation.

I have edited it today to NPOV it and reverted you 3 times for POV pushing, as your User: page states "Much of my editing is involved with keeping crank theories out". Perpetual motion machine


You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

abakharev 01:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)