Perdurantism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Perdurantism or perdurance theory is a philosophical theory of persistence and identity. The perdurantist view is often defined as being the claim that objects have distinct Temporal Parts as opposed to endurantism (primarily endurantism is defined as stating that the whole of an individual is always present). However, contemporary debate has demonstrate the difficulties in defining perdurantism (and also endurantism). For instance, the work of Sider (2001) has suggested that even enduring objects can have temporal parts, and it is more accurate to define perdurantism as being the claim that objects have a temporal part at every instant that they exist. Zimmerman (1996) has said that this won't work as there have been many self-professed perdurantists who believe that time is 'gunky' and that for every interval of time, there is a sub-interval. Consequently there are no instants, and Sider's definition must be altered to admit of this fact. Currently there is no universally acknowledged definition of perdurantism (see also McKinnon (2002) and Merricks (1999)).
Perdurantists break into two distinct sub-groups. The former are 'worm theorists'. They believe that a persisting object is composed of the various temporal parts that it has. So all persisting objects are four-dimensional 'worms' that stretch across space-time, and that you are mistaken in believing that chairs, mountains and people are actually three-dimensional. This is to be contrasted to a more recent twist called 'stage theory'. Stage theorists take you to be identical a particular temporal part at any given time. So, in a manner of speaking, I only exist for an instantaneous period of time. However there are other temporal parts at other times which I am related to in a certain way (Sider talks of 'modal counterpart relations', whilst Hawley talks of 'non-Humean relations') such that when I say that I was a child, or that I will be an OAP, these things are true because I am related to a temporal part that is a child (that exists in the past) or a temporal part that is an OAP (that exists in the future). Stage theorists are sometimes called 'exdurantists'.
There are many reasons on offer to become a perdurantist, ranging from problems in logic, to the problem of temporary intrinsics, to the problems of the Ship of Theseus. An excellent survey can be found in Sider (2001).
[edit] Notable perdurantists
- Jonathan Edwards who argued that the sum of every stage of every person could be considered as one enormous whole. In doing so, he alleged to have solved the problem of Original Sin: it is not unfair of God to punish you for the sins of Adam and Eve, for God is merely punishing the enormous whole that has Adam and Eve as temporal parts, and so the enormous whole is guilty of sin. Your being punished is merely an unfortunate side effect of this.
- David Kellogg Lewis - Argued perdurance theory was necessary for time travel
- Alfred Whitehead
- J.J.C. Smart
- W.V. Quine
- Mark Heller
- Ted Sider
- Katherine Hawley
- Robin Le Poidevin
- Hud Hudson
- Leonard Goodman
- Yuri Balashov, who has produced a large amount of literature concerning perdurantism and special relativity.
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- Temporal parts - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- McKinnon, N. 2002. The Endurance/Perdurance Distinction The Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80:3 p. 288-306.
- Merricks, T. 1999. Persistence, Parts and Presentism. Nous 33 p. 421-38.
- Sider, T. 2001. Four-Dimensionalism Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Zimmerman, D. 1996. Persistence and Presentism, Philosophical Papers 25:2.
