Talk:Pell number
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Nonsense formula
I moved the following claim to the talk page:
- The closed form is:
This formula (if correct), needs to mention Pn somewhere. As it stands, it doesn't seem to make any sense. Haseldon
[edit] Split this page/References
It may be that this page could be split into two, or just explained differently.
There is more detail on this and I will do my best although my mathematics knowledge is not advanced at the moment. I think there is a closed form. Also there are some applications (see the references).
- http://users.tellurian.net/hsejar/maths/pell
- http://listserv.nodak.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0412&L=nmbrthry&F=&S=&P=3566
- http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LucasNumber.html
I can return to this in Spring 2005. User:Fountainofignorance