Talk:Paul Thurrott
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Help
Hi, I need some help on expanding this article, Please help me. Please!!!!!
- Windows72106 13:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'll get onto it as soon as I have time - probably within a day or so, since it's approaching midnight here. RandyWang (raves/rants) 13:51, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hangon
Paul Thurrott is a very well known technology pundit, and has made the news a number of times. He is definitely notable - so, rather than speedying this, I propose we actually add some content explaining his significance.
His Internet Nexus and WinSuperSite pages are, after all, the first two hits on a Google search for Paul Thurrott... among more than half a million other hits. RandyWang (raves/rants) 13:50, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've added a short piece on his notability. It's midnight: hopefully, this will be enough to avoid this article being speedied before morning. :) RandyWang (raves/rants) 14:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed Deletion
Out of interest, why is this still be proposed for deletion? It contains the minimal information that was requested, and is currently under speedy construction: it would be far more valuable to simply list some primary concerns to be addressed, and remove the tag. Considering that Thurrott is a significant individual, deleting this article achieves nothing; listing it as needing expansion and/or proposing solutions to its current state do.
I've therefore removed the deletion tag, in good faith. I simply believe that it already meets the requested criteria, and now needs specific criticism (and a hearty dose of expansion). RandyWang (raves/rants) 15:10, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- no problem here... some minor POV cleanup, a couple sources citing his notability/popularity, and some expansion, and it could be a good article... - Adolphus79 15:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Removed Apple x86 references
I removed the above-mentioned reference due to the fact that the source is highly dubious...The "many technology critics" are just a bunch of forum users responding to a thread. Also the fact that he was right should make the entire point of the critcism moot... Scott 110 01:16, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
