Talk:Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Feel free to help me tune up this page before the end of the VfD process. 128.122.91.174 3 July 2005 18:02 (UTC)

[edit] Vote for Deletion

This article survived a Vote for Deletion, with a decision to keep and cleanup. It has correspondingly been sent to cleanup. The VfD discussion may be found here. -Splash 01:02, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

This site reads like a brouchure. I'm surprised a big-dog firm like this has no wikipedia attention.

This site is too + vely biased. Should be deleted. Apologies for raising the request again.

Does the author of the above line have a chip on her/his shoulder? The entries for peer firms are no better.

Some agent for the firm continues to delete section detailing the firm's negative publicity. These developments are well-documented and are a part of the public record. This section should be left intact.