Patrick Byrne

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Editing of this article by unregistered or newly registered users is currently disabled.
Such users may discuss changes, request unprotection, or create an account.

Patrick M. Byrne is CEO of internet retailer Overstock.com. He has also become well known for his media campaign and lawsuit involvement [1] regarding stock market regulation and alleged hedge fund, media, and analyst improprieties [2].

1 Background
2 "Dutch Auction" IPO
3 Campaign against naked shorting
4 Media attention
5 Education lobbying
6 External links

Background

Patrick Byrne received a bachelor’s degree from Dartmouth College (Asian Studies & Philosophy), a master’s degree in philosophy from Cambridge University as a Marshall scholar, and a doctorate in philosophy from Stanford University.

Byrne served as Chairman, President and CEO of Centricut, LLC, a manufacturer of industrial torches, then held the same three positions at Fechheimer Brothers, Inc., a Berkshire Hathaway company manufacturing police, firefighter, and military uniforms. Currently Byrne is CEO and Chairman of Utah-based internet retailer Overstock.com.

"Dutch Auction" IPO

Byrne's first campaign fight against alleged Wall Street unfairness started with his 2002 dutch auction of IPO of Overstock.com, one of the first companies to go public under the Hambrecht system. "A lot of pressure was brought to bear by going with Hambrecht," says Byrne, who believes that competing banks shorted his company's stock prior to a July 31, 2002, Wall Street Journal article in order to sully the auction's effect.[3]

When Google also later went public via a Dutch Auction IPO, "That's when I smelled a skunk," said Byrne. "It was an orchestrated campaign by the banks that just didn't want to see it succeed." [4]

Campaign against naked shorting

In 2005, Byrne contended that a market-wide conspiracy to commit naked short selling was targeting Overstock.com. Short selling is a way for an investor to bet that the share price of a company will decline by borrowing shares from someone else, selling them, buying them back at a future date, and returning the repurchased shares to the lender. If the stock price when the shares are repurchased is lower than the price at which the shares were sold, the investor makes a profit. In naked short selling, the shares are not borrowed prior to the sale, a practice which is illegal.

Byrne claims that the same people whom he has accused of perpetrating these crimes have now organized a massive disinformation campaign wherein the same elements are repeated over and over in an effort to confuse the public. For example, at the end of his webcast, Byrne mentioned that he thought there might be a figure coordinating these activities, whom he has referred to as the "Sith Lord".

Byrne told an analyst conference call in August 2005 that the Sith Lord is "a name that everybody on the phone, every single person on the phone would recognize this person's name. He's one of the master criminals from the 1980s, and he's back in business."[5] Byrne has never identified the "Sith Lord." He repeated the conspiracy allegations several times during 2006, contending the markets were "broken." He has likened the conspiracy to Al-Qaeda, saying "There's no office, no headquarters; it's a splintered group that has learned to operate together."[6]

Byrne's campaign against naked short selling has been widely criticized, with New York Times columnist Joseph Nocera saying: "Except for a few fellow-traveling Web sites, where Mr. Byrne is viewed as a heroic figure, most people who understand the issue or have looked into it think it's pretty bogus." [7]. Numerous other writers and commentators have criticized what they believe to be Byrne's excessive zeal and overblown hyperbole in discussing this issue, while a similarly vocal group of advocates has taken Byrne's part.

In an effort to deal with whatever level of naked shorting may exist, the SEC has enacted Reg SHO, which is intended to help control Failures to Deliver. [8]. Its effectiveness to date is the subject of much debate.

In March 2006, John Byrne, chairman of Overstock.com and father of Patrick Byrne, said that he was thinking of stepping down in disagreement over his son's "jihad" over naked short-selling. This development contributed to the controversy over Byrne's behavior. [9] In April 2006, John Byrne stepped down to become vice-chairman, and was replaced by Patrick Byrne. In July 2006, the elder Byrne resigned from Overstock's board of directors.

Media attention

Since Byrne launched Overstock.com in 1999, he and his company have garnered attention from numerous national media outlets. Among them are the Wall Street Journal, ABC News with Peter Jennings, Fortune, CBS Marketwatch, and Business Week, among others. He has also appeared on Bloomberg TV, CNBC, and Fox News shows such as [[Your World with Neil Cavuto]. In 2002, Byrne was named to Business Week’s list of the 25 most influential people in e-Business: the magazine cited survival strength and vision as qualities that qualified Byrne for the list. In 2003 Ernst & Young awarded Byrne an "Entrepreneur of the Year" award in the category of Lifetime Achievement.

Not all media attention has been positive. In a column in the New York Times in February 2006, journalist Joseph Nocera condemned Byrne's attacks on analysts and the press as a "campaign of menace."[10], while CBS MarketWatch's Hank Greenberg has named Byrne the runner-up for Worst CEO of the Year two years running. [11]

Education lobbying

Byrne is head of an education lobbying organization called First Class Education. The organization's primary goal is what they call the "65% solution", which would require 65% of all education spending to be spent on what is considered "in the classroom education". There is a controversy regarding how this category is defined (such as the inclusion of athletics programs and exclusion of libraries and librarians). The plan has been criticized by the National Education Association and other groups. [12] The NEA cites a study by Standard and Poor's, which indicated "no significant positive correlation between the percentage of funds that districts spend on instruction and the percentage of students who score proficient or higher on state reading and math tests." [13] According to First Class Education, as of July 2006, 2 states have implemented their plan so far— Missouri and Oklahoma. (They also list Colorado but it is not yet enacted in Colorado. Ballot issues 39 and J will be voted on in November 2006 to decide the issue.) [14]