User talk:Parjay

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] A welcome from Master of Puppets

Hello, Parjay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :) _-M o P-_ 23:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] re: Albert Wesker

"Parjay, I don't see how it's nonsense when the page is about a "fictional" character, and everyone is only speaculating upon what they know about the character, Albert Wesker."

They AREN'T speculating - this is an encyclopedia - ONLY fact can be written here (yes FACT about FICTIONAL CHARACTERS). No speculation. For example: Wesker is a white guy = fact. "This element, or concept in the story could lead up and explain why Wesker is on to "The Organazition" = SPECULATION.

"As for my names being in the entries, I believe even Wikipedia has a feature where you can sign your name. Would rather have me do that for every, little editing I do, or entry? I think not."

You aren't following. You CANNOT sign your name ON THE ARTICLE PAGE, when you make an edit your name is automatically applied to the edit on the HISTORY page.

"I have viewed at the help page for editing and the guidelines as well, but the guidelinds state "In a nutshell". Meaning, that you may write anything you like about the character in this seclection as long as if it's about with the character and the theories about the character do not go off the character."

Only FACT. This is an encyclopedia, not a collection of dubious theories. Everything must have a source that can be verfied by others.

"But I don't allow that to hold me back from writing or saying what is on my mind."

With this mentality you will be eventually banned from editing the site. Again, read the HELP SECTIONS. I know you say your English isn't great, so please try and understand the rules before you edit further articles. Once again, this is a place for FACT, not speculative theories, do not add your name to the article itself, and ONLY write in NEUTRAL voice - that is, you cannot write "I think," or "I believe," or "post your theories here" etc. etc. etc. Parjay 16:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


ShadowFox S.T.A.R.S.: Ok... Well, I do see your points, but there no need to become upset about it. (big text, yelling) It can be changed, etc. My comprehension of English is just fine. I just have trouble with using correct English and Grammar when I write and I am also not the best speller, neither am I the best typer but that doesn't mean I am not capable or intelligent. I am okay with living with these flaws for the meantime. Yes, I have the metality to write what is on my mind, but when it comes to reference articles, I usually do not write about a subject without some real research, or I do not come up with conclusions (theories) without some real resources.

As you stated before, I understand now that it's suppose be of "fact" only, like the example you have given me. "Wesker is white". I will take the blame of not viewing the guildlines completely. But there are many contradictions on Wesker's page. Sometimes, you can't always count on fact to fill in the holes for you. You got to come to a determination when to use your own judgement, such as reading a book and believing everything in it, or using your own brain, and you can't always refer back to the subject if the internet does not provide the proof. Somethings are found only offline. But as for using facts on the pages, you can count on it as being a rule here, which should be followed and which I will respect. :P I am still new here, so bare with me until I have gotten the hang to using the features on Wikipedia.

                           *.:.`ShadowFox` S.T.A.R.S..:.* 17:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)ShadowFox S.T.A.R.S.


[edit] Leon Kennedy trivia

Regarding Leon's entry into Raccoon City. It wouldn't really matter whether his teammates had already been killed or not, they would probably still allow access to police officers to assist the military units if only to advise on locations and layout. Besides, Leon enters the scene several days after the outbreak begins, any form of partying going on seems very unlikely. Gamer Junkie 16:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps, but it wasn't what was written (ie, alongside their entry). What do you mean about the partying? Parjay 20:22, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Well it seems unlikely that Leon would be doing any partying or indeed anything of any normality while his unit is being destroyed on the streets. I know he wasn't in Raccoon City, but surely he would have been called in to assist as soon as the shit hit the fan, right?

By the way, The archives where written by fans weren't they? Don't they also state that S.T.A.R.S. was established in 1968 or something? Seems Capcom isn't overly concerned with how things are run over there, eh? Gamer Junkie 09:29, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

"Well it seems unlikely that Leon would be doing any partying or indeed anything of any normality while his unit is being destroyed on the streets. I know he wasn't in Raccoon City, but surely he would have been called in to assist as soon as the shit hit the fan, right?" - well he wasn't. He was reporting to the RPD for his first day on the job, he would have gotten assignments then.
"By the way, The archives where written by fans weren't they? Don't they also state that S.T.A.R.S. was established in 1968 or something? Seems Capcom isn't overly concerned with how things are run over there, eh?" that's the USA website you are thinking about (which is stealing from fan-made timeline). The Archives was written by CAPCOM and the developers in Japan. Parjay 11:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Very well, I'll take your word on it. Gamer Junkie 14:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/a/r/User_talk%7EParjay_a634.html"