Talk:Particle-in-cell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

I have rewritten this page from scratch. The original entry was poor, and made a rather inappropriate reference to a particular researcher and his code. I have tried to give the proper historical perspective (including essential references), as well as to define the method in the most general possible context. -- Jcandy 08:01, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I have worked a little harder to get the history correct, and added two references. Also, I think the idea ought to be to keep the introduction general and nontechnical. For this reason, I moved the points about PIC procedure to the Technical Aspects section. Finally, there was a very long, partisan list of codes from a single group. This is really not appropriate, is it? In response, I cut the code list and added the text "Contains links to freely-available software" to the Berkeley link. My opinion is that Wikipedia is not free advertising for your research group's website and projects. -- Jcandy 08:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Since PIC method is one kind of PM methods, I think an explanation on PM, PP, and PP-PM in Technical Aspects section should be moved to a new page such as 'particle model'. -- Mindgame123 05:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree. This text was inherited from an earlier edit. -- Jcandy 06:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)