Talk:Pardus (computer game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Famicom style controller This article is part of WikiProject Computer and video games, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Portal:CVG
 CVG Portal
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
CVG To-do:
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on Aug 1 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

It is actually located here.

Well written article, I'm rather impressed :) -Moocats 17:58, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, i play the game myself, so i started filling the alliance pages, well the ones i know a bit about. I better ask permission to add more. -ChrisB88 17:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Movement of articles

Pardus Pardus_enemies and hawk family of fighters could be made into a "sub-article" i.e Pardus/Enemies, Pardus/Hawk fami..

Agreed. There is no need for separate articles. -- Ze miguel 12:58, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
How would.. one proceed to do so. 211.26.118.231 10:36, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Are the Hawk family of fighters and the enemies articles really needed at all?
No, they aren't needed, and they will be deleted shortly.--digital_me(TalkˑContribs) 16:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Naming conventions

I've found references to "NPC"s, and while those are technically NPCs, I'd rather use some other word. I've changed both occurences to "monsters", but maybe a link to "mobs" would be more appropriate?

Monsters is an obviously unsuitable term. However, mobs is fine ;)

[edit] Deletion

Anyone know why this would be deleted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rtconner (talk • contribs) 14:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi rtconner; if you follow the link off the article to the discussion regarding deletion, you'll see the reasons people are laying out. Essentially, some people feel the game is too small/new/non-notable to have an article here at Wikipedia. Anyone's welcome to comment in that page, but be aware that excessively "new" editors who came because it was mentioned on the game site, for example, may be discounted. -- nae'blis 20:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Action points

Any objection to removing the "unique" descriptor? Many Browser based games use fundamentally similar mechanics for exactly the same reason.

To expand, remove most unique descriptors. TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 07:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of Top Alliances

The top alliances in the game is not important to the understanding of the game, and few outside of the player base would care about such information. In an attempt to wikify this article and trim it a bit, I have removed this subsection.

I have also removed the following:

The game's commodities suffer from the problem of redundancy: the majority of commodities have no other in-game purpose aside from trade ("buy low sell high"). Although the game contains many types of commodities and buildings producing them, this does not add to gameplay. The game's community has voiced concern over this problem several times and the developers are probably [citation needed] working on a future update to create uses for them.

As of current, the only item that does not have an inherent use in the game is the exotic crystal.

"Sethimothy 01:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Is the picture to the rad collector really needed? It isn't particularly relevant to the paragraph. TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 07:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Not in the least. Removed. We should consider editing this section a bit to be less of a player guide and more of an informative article on the game. Sethimothy 00:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
I agree but ... I wouldn't know where to start ;) TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 05:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


took out personal insults towards developer. Cronos 213.39.252.226 23:40, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Maybe we can add a criticisms section :ninja:

[edit] Wikified

Hi guys. I took a major run through the article, keeping all the content, but formatting it differently for readability and article flow. I also added a few wiki links. This article is looking very nice, great work guys, keep it up. I'm going to check the game out (it looks like it's right up my alley. Oh yes, Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 04:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

The basic gameplay section is all prettifuls now. Thanks! :) --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 06:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Is "Additional new free features will be implemented at the same time." correct? I can't recall anything fitting that happening.

Not sure. I didn't remove or add any content, only did some formatting. JubalHarshaw 14:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Feature watch

Is the "Additional new free features will be implemented at the same time" passage correct? I can't recall anything fitting that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thorn Darkstrike (talk • contribs) .

Exactly my thinking. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 08:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Criticism

I obviously can't add any references or links for the ban feature. Most of it is from the hall of banned and the only way to access it is by logging into your Pardus account. Please Baldur and Bladefist don't delete this section about the game. We all know how much you like to silence any thing bad that is said about your game. This is not nazi Austria or Germany by the way, in US we have something called the freedom of speech. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 160.94.27.142 (talk • contribs) 16:19, 13 October 2006.

First, let me say, nice job on this article ... when I got here to wikify it, most the work was already done. Regarding this section: Added "citation needed" and a sources needed tag for this section. It fails "neutral point of view", fails "verifiability" completely, and sounds alot like original research as it stands now. I recommend reviewing these three pillars of Wikipedia. I admire your love for the 1st Amendment, but you're not applying it correctly in the Wikipedia context. You have the right to edit any article and insert or remove information (verified, or otherwise) ... every other editor has that same right, so you can expect unsourced content to be removed at any point. If verifiable, sourced content is removed, well, the article can be reverted to its previous state. Wikipedia strives to be an encyclopedia. An encyclopedia provides neutral information regarding notable, verifiable topics. I myself personally as an editor am very lenient about sources (I'm usually more concerned about article cleanup and tagging unsourced articles), but if you can't provide something to show that this isn't just your original research on the subject ... it could be removed at any time. You'll note the article has already survived one deletion debate. JubalHarshaw 22:42, 13 October 2006 (UTC)d

I do not find this article to be objective, I think it is anti-dev and I would appreciate something more balanced. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.43.50.189 (talk • contribs) .

I hope you mean section :). Unless the editor can provide references the section will likely be removed soon. Especially since for some odd reason every line is linebreaked making the article very tedious to reorganise. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 04:08, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

To the person that readded the segment. Please source it and remove some linebreaks. You have a linebreak (pressed enter) after every sentence. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 22:00, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/a/r/Talk%7EPardus_%28computer_game%29_23c6.html"