Participation criterion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The participation criterion is a voting system criterion for evaluating voting systems. It has been defined as follows:
- Douglas Woodall's definition: The addition of a further ballot should not, for any positive whole number k, reduce the probability that at least one candidate is elected out of the first k candidates listed on that ballot.
- Mike Ossipoff's definition: Adding one or more ballots that vote X over Y should never change the winner from X to Y.
Plurality voting, Approval voting, cardinal ratings, and Borda count all satisfy the participation criterion. All Condorcet methods, Bucklin voting, Majority Choice Approval, and IRV fail.
If a voting system fails the participation criterion, then a particularly unusual strategy of not voting can, in at least some circumstances, help a voter's preferred choice win.
The participation criterion for voting systems is one example of a rational participation constraint for social choice mechanisms in general.
Contents |
[edit] Quorum requirements
The most common failure of the participation criterion is not in the use of particular voting systems, but in simple yes or no measures that place quorum requirements. A public referendum, for example, that required majority approval and a certain number of voters to participate in order to pass would fail the participation criterion, as a minority of voters preferring the "no" option could cause the measure to fail by simply not voting rather than voting no. A referendum that required a minimum number of yes votes (not counting no's), by contrast, would pass the participation criterion.
[edit] See also
[edit] References
Some parts of this article are derived with permission from text at http://electionmethods.org
[edit] External links
- Traditional single-winner criteria by Mike Ossipoff
- Electoral criteria by Blake Cretney
- Voting criteria by James Green-Armytage