Parliamentary ping-pong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Parliamentary ping-pong (or "lutte a la corde") is a phrase[1][2][3] used to describe a phenomenon in the British Parliament, which is bicameral, in which the normal legislative procedure is radically accelerated to the extent that the proposed law, or Bill, appears to bounce back and forth between the two chambers like a ping-pong ball.

The rule is that a Bill must be passed in its final form by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords without changes before it can become law. If one of the Houses makes any change or amendment to it, the other House has to agree to those changes, or make counter-changes of its own, in which case it returns to the first House. The debates in which the Bill is considered are usually scheduled months apart.

However, in certain circumstances when there is a non-negotiable time limit, and the two Houses disagree vehemently on the matter, this process can be speeded up to less than six hours per cycle, and carries on until one of the sides caves in.

Usually the time limit is imposed by the end of the Parliamentary session when all business, including incomplete Bills, simply gets erased from the books and has to start again. This usually occurs at the state opening of Parliament some time in November - Parliament can continue working on the previous year right up to the night before. Another instance is just after a general election is called, when Parliament can work for a few days before it gets dissolved, and the legislation it is working on must either get completed or be thrown away.

[edit] "Lutte a la corde"

"Lutte a la corde" (French, meaning tug of war, lit. "struggle of the rope") is an older term for Parliamentary ping-pong. Believed to derive from the Norman French, in recent times it has fallen out of common usage.

[edit] An example: the Prevention of Terrorism Bill

An extreme example of ping-ponging began on the night of 10 March 2005 and ran for thirty hours. The Bill in question was the Prevention of Terrorism Bill 2005, necessary to create the control order so that the 10 terrorist suspects imprisoned under recently nullified Part IV of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 could be prevented from walking free [4]. The dispute was over whether the Bill should have a sunset clause. The timetable of this session ran as follows:

House of Lords - 11:31am to 3:00pm
House of Commons - 6:00pm to 7:37pm
House of Lords - 10:15pm to 11:26pm
House of Commons - 1:20am to 2:39am
House of Lords - 5:00am to 5.56am
House of Commons - 8:00am to 9:13am
House of Lords - 11:40am to 1:11pm
House of Commons - 3:30pm to 4:50pm
House of Lords - 6:30pm to 7:00pm

The Bill received Royal assent at 7:20pm.[5]

[edit] Other recent examples