Talk:Pandora Peaks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 16 August 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
[edit] Something which may interest editors of this page
Any help which could be provided would be greatly appreciated. -Godfearing Parent.
- I'm failing to see how this violates any sense of decency? It's an article about a notable porn star and there are no "obscene" or "pornographic" pictures on the article page. If no one responds in 5 days I'll delete this POV tag. Gateman1997 22:12, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
-
- I'm not a fan of this so-called Decency project, but I do think it would be better to have a picture of Pandora Peaks that doesn't have her hand down her pants.--Prosfilaes 22:19, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- Frankly I don't see how it matters. (I agree there might be better shots of her out there, but that's beside the point). This tag is used to identify obscene articles. This article is neither obscene nor offensive unless your a raging right winger with a "Jesus Saves" bumpersticker. (Please note that she is fully clothed in the pic.)Gateman1997 22:44, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- SHE IS NOT FULLY CLOTHED. She clearly has on an immodest bikini top that shows off her breasts in their practical entirety. With breasts that large she should cover up quite a bit so as not to titillate or offend, a good appropriate modest dress would be some heavy sweaters or jackets that covered her obscene figure. -DavidsCrusader 23:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- This is the problem with your "project". You are attempting to push your view of obscene on the rest of Wikipedia which violates WP:NOT and WP:NPOV. She could walk down the street in that getup totally legally and without any recourse from the authorities. If you find it offense, then tough, its your opinion and your opinion means squat.Gateman1997 23:59, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- It has been mentioned that your debater is a sockpuppet yahoo attempting to stir up trouble and intentionally not represent what any of this is about. Even if he is real, he does not represent anyone's views but his own -- and I think it is a solitary view. --Noitall 14:08, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
- It should be noted that the wonder twins are her most notable feature and the basis of her career (which additionally the picture well relates to). As such a more modest picture would be much less illustrative. Mind you, the opinion of a female wikipedian who wouldn't have to make this kind of weak excuses for her libido would be interesting to hear. --Kizor 08:54, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
- I seriously doubt Pandora Peaks is a Wikipedian.Gateman1997 14:08, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
- Didn't say anything of the sort. Just poking fun at myself. --Kizor 14:35, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
- I seriously doubt Pandora Peaks is a Wikipedian.Gateman1997 14:08, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
- This is the problem with your "project". You are attempting to push your view of obscene on the rest of Wikipedia which violates WP:NOT and WP:NPOV. She could walk down the street in that getup totally legally and without any recourse from the authorities. If you find it offense, then tough, its your opinion and your opinion means squat.Gateman1997 23:59, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- SHE IS NOT FULLY CLOTHED. She clearly has on an immodest bikini top that shows off her breasts in their practical entirety. With breasts that large she should cover up quite a bit so as not to titillate or offend, a good appropriate modest dress would be some heavy sweaters or jackets that covered her obscene figure. -DavidsCrusader 23:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- Frankly I don't see how it matters. (I agree there might be better shots of her out there, but that's beside the point). This tag is used to identify obscene articles. This article is neither obscene nor offensive unless your a raging right winger with a "Jesus Saves" bumpersticker. (Please note that she is fully clothed in the pic.)Gateman1997 22:44, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not a fan of this so-called Decency project, but I do think it would be better to have a picture of Pandora Peaks that doesn't have her hand down her pants.--Prosfilaes 22:19, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] next Pandora?
My only question is, if she's retired, who is going to take her place? There has to be someone out there with the same fake ones, same size, similar other dimensions. Yes there are lots of adults stars, but who quite "stack up" in all areas of interest.
[edit] Statistical data
Well, based on this video at YouTube it seems that the Japanese have measured her scientifically. The video's in Japanese, but the results are displayed quite clearly. No nudity here. The 72HH given here is obviously wrong, as it would indicate a morbidly obese woman. --Anshelm '77 16:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
